Workers would be much happier if they are doing different types of tasks during their workday than doing the same task.
The importance of work, the foundation of a quality life, has been universally recognized as more than evident, bringing to people’s attention the debate over + a satisfying working mode. Doing a single task during the workday, from some people’s viewpoints, can increase employees’ delight. In opposition to their opinions, my perspective is that it is enjoyable for employees to do various kinds of tasks, because of the benefits to efficiency and the relationship at work.
A high priority is that when dealing with different tasks in workplaces, instead of a single one, employees will enhance their efficiency, by reducing time and decreasing errors. To begin with, the more numerous work people cope with, the more time they can save. In detail, due to freshness caused by distinct and new work, workers will not allocate time to killing their time, such as browsing posts on the social media, shopping online or playing video games, which boosts their efficiency; on the contrary, how could people distribute all the working time to dealing with one single task when they experience tediousness and boredom? In addition, only under the requirement of accomplishing assorted tasks can employees lower the risks of errors. Specifically, with different projects to address, workers will undergo pressure, set higher expectations to themselves and become more concentrated on work, resulting in fewer mistakes; in contrast, never can we ignore that employees handling the same work during their workdays find it less laborious and get distracted frequently due to their assumed expertise, under which circumstance they will commit more errors.
Equally importantly, a positive relationship with colleagues and their supervisor in the work field will be established when workers tackle assorted tasks, instead of just one. Initially, it is during the process of doing different projects that they can make a strong bond with their coworkers. To be more specific, employees, when coping with diverse tasks, will encounter, interact with and cooperate with those from different departments and enlarge their friend circles; however, never will a person feel delighted if he meets and communicates only with several colleagues in his group and discuss a limited number of topics each day. Additionally, it is well-known that supervisors will appreciate those with skills and expertise in diverse fields. In detail, not only can versatile employees boost sales and maximize profits, but also they will reduce the number of workers and lower budgets for his corporation, who thus are more likely to get promoted by their boss; contrarily, with merely limited knowledge or techniques a employee will not be valued by his executive.
Efficiency, a significant factor at work, will be enhanced under the demand of assorted assignments. A close connection, an ingredient in a satisfying professional life, can be built when workers are required to do different projects. To conclude, only by accomplishing different work can workers achieve a satisfying life at work.
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 73
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 73
- Spartacus the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several 65
- Workers would be much happier if they are doing different types of tasks during their workday than doing the same task 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...stance they will commit more errors. Equally importantly, a positive relationship wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1033, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... merely limited knowledge or techniques a employee will not be valued by his exec...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, in addition, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2596.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 479.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41962421712 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95009416046 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528183716075 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 782.1 618.680645161 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 4.94265232975 344% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.822867402 48.9658058833 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 162.25 100.406767564 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9375 20.6045352989 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229345773447 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903250597237 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641589118402 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148801745125 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193460125151 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 11.7677419355 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 86.8835125448 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.