Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups, and all members of the group receive the same grade (mark) on the project. Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students?
Teamwork, a crucial way of education in the classroom, has been valued and even triggers a heated discussion over whether or not all students in the same group receive identical grades. Giving the same score, in some people's view, is a beneficial method to evaluate students. Contrary to those people's opinion is my perspective that students working on the same project in a group should receive different grades, due to the contributions to academic performance and personal development.
What must be prioritized is that different marks, instead of the same grades, given to students among their group improve students' academic ability by enlarging their knowledge base and boosting their motivation to study. Initially, only receiving a higher grade can encourage students to learn more stuff through teamwork. In detail, to get a higher grade, not only will a student dive deeper into the textbook, but also he may study extra information using the search engine; on the contrary, wishing other students in the group finish the project, never can a student learn a thing for himself. Additionally, different scores for students in a group motives to study harder. To explain it further, when fearing getting a low grade and even not being able to pass this course, students who have no partner in their group to rely on overcome their laziness easily, and finish their part of the task in time; in contrast, expecting the same grade all across their group and their classmate to finish majority tasks, how can students do any stuff for their group.
What is equally worth discussing is that not getting identical scores among groups has a positive influence on student's personal development, including honing their teamwork skills and fostering their independence. To begin with, it is the different grades between members of the group that provide students with the opportunities to practice teamwork. Specifically, receiving different scores, being a fair judgment of how successful their teamwork is, creates a competitive environment for students to arrange the tasks and do their part of the job; however, never can such an environment be established, due to the unfairness felt by students who get the same score no matter what they do for the team. Furthermore, with students being scored differently, their ability to handle the task independently will be improved. In detail, tasks, which students are assigned to, and which their grades will base on, require them to tackle on their own; in contrast, with students having identical grades among the group, never will the opportunity to independently solve the problem be provided to all the students.
Academic performance, an important aspect of students' development, will be improved by receiving different grades among the group. Personal development, a crucial element of a student's advancement, will be benefited via different scores. To conclude, only by giving students in the same group different marks can students be well evaluated.
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 73
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 73
- Spartacus the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several 65
- Workers would be much happier if they are doing different types of tasks during their workday than doing the same task 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... even triggers a heated discussion over whether or not all students in the same group receive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'motif', 'motive'?
Suggestion: motif; motive
...ifferent scores for students in a group motives to study harder. To explain it further,...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...nal development, a crucial element of a students advancement, will be benefited via diff...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, in contrast, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2535.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27027027027 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83615357481 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47817047817 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.1541061897 48.9658058833 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.4375 100.406767564 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0625 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300310832028 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12616748964 0.076458572812 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617006879063 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21641541087 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354285471376 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 11.7677419355 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.88 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.