Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole
Youngsters are always the future of the whole society, thus, they play significant roles in the country's development. When facing the statement that young people have no influence on the critical decisions, some people hold the positive opinion but I do not accede to it. As far as I am concerned, young people are the ones that should always be considered since they have the invisible potential to change the future. Even if they cannot make important decisions, they can still make a difference by speaking out their voices.
Primarily, youngsters are the future of the society and they do affect important decisions. We should always bear in mind that anything that contribute to their development can be extremely rewarding so we should definitely give them a chance if they have their own minds. If we do not pay much attention to them, the progress of the society can be stagnant. The situation is similar to planting trees, where young people resemble young trees. If some young trees become sick but we just ignore this, next year there will be fewer trees due to the sickness. Therefore, the right solution is to treat these trees can ensure their being healthy. From this example we can learn that how young trees can influence the whole situation and important decisions.
Secondly, young people are also residents and they have the right to make decisions. For instance, some policies with regard to education are to put forward which will jeopardize students' interests. Consequently, young people refute strongly against it and complain to the government. Finally, these policies were cancelled as a result of the tremendous opposing voice. That is a good example to demonstrate how young people can make sense in altering important decisions.
Admittedly, it is the leader who makes the final decision when confronting vital issues since young people are not mature enough. However, we can never rule out the possibility that these youngsters can become elites and leaders in the future. They bear the potential to make important decisions can change the situation of the whole society.
To summarize, young people are the basic stones of the society. If we do not cultivate them appropriately, we can never lay a solid foundation for the development of the society.
- In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 70
- sports and social activities 60
- sports and social activities 90
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 73
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks, so they called 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ference by speaking out their voices. Primarily, youngsters are the future of ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le situation and important decisions. Secondly, young people are also resident...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the situation of the whole society. To summarize, young people are the basic...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, as a result, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08994708995 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68827330439 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492063492063 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7699530348 48.9658058833 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.619047619 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38095238095 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276449637064 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090706646708 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715848122212 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156010964343 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568639305389 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.