Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
Nowadays youths and their impacts on the nations have gotten lucid for everyone who can pick a major choice like governors and managers. Despite this fact, there is a controversial question asking whether the new generation does not have enough effects on considerable decisions. I am afraid, I disagree with the opinion which is expressing the lack of ability to choose a variety of routes for young persons.
First of all, one of the most significant parts of countries is the university which is filled with a lot of students who are between 18 to 27 years old and lots of places to gather people for speaking about their preferences. Academies are the best site for educating and fostering new persons. To put on the other hand, an individual has an opportunity to participate in these kinds of sessions and having a role in his future. Under such a circumstance, students can listen to each other and after all, send their decision to the persons who are powerful and governing the country. A personal experience of mine can drive this fact home, I had been leading the scientific community in my university for several years until I finished my university. Once upon a time while we were preparing a new newspaper of university, we found the government was going to change the boss of the university, we were not in favor of the decision; therefore, we write a paper about the event which was going to happen. The government alternated their choice neither for fearing nor for pressuring, they had done it because they were aware of students' attitude.
Second, politicians notice that not considering young people in the passing laws, has negative effects on whole lands. To be specific, young persons are going to manage the state and not having experience in this issue is harmful to the county in the tomorrow. It is crystal clear, a person who has a lot of lessons about facing problems is proper for controlling the realm. As an illustration, I am going to speak about my brother who has worked in a company which building houses for four years. He had promoted in his career, however, he was young, because he saw a lot of difficulties in the company during the project. The boss of the company thinks they need young people who have enough experience in a hard situation. If the boss had not permitted young people to involve in decisions, my brother would not promote in his job.
By and large, I do believe youths have strong impacts on their prospect. Since they have universities that help them to tell their comments also directors and supervisors who let them gain skills for tomorrow.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Somayya | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Somayya | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | mohammad9090 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | nusybah | 76 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 58
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favoriterecreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits,however, and the city park department devotes little 50
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 76
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, after all, speaking about, by and large, first of all, i am afraid, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76379690949 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70813336565 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523178807947 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.811058193 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.578947368 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8421052632 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113906071779 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412879704051 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428038819045 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729868781444 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426810790876 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.