In your country, is there more need for land to be left in its natural condition or is there more need for land to be developed for housing and industry? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people claim that the land should stay untouched, others argue that every acre of land should be developed for commercial buildings and structures. I, personally, think that specifically in my country there is a need to develop more land in order to build industrial factories and houses. I feel this way because of two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, the country that I am from is called developing country and like all developing countries needs more industrial buildings to be built to grow economically. This particular task could be achieved if government will utilize more land for this purposes. Moreover, every industrial building could bring benefits to economics. For example, it is workplaces for people. Needless to say that the more factories will be build the more workplaces people will receive. Especially it is crucial for oil countries, which economy is strictly dependable from the oil export.
Secondly, more industrial buildings means more supporting infrastructure like schools, apartments, universities, hospitals and even roads have to be build in this area. For instance, ones my country decided to build a special gaming zone for casinos far away in Siberia. In order to construct it they had to built an airport not far from the construction zone. Furthermore, civil infrastructure was built to make place for living first and only then the construction of this zone began. After they finished this project many people went there to search work and to live in the new place for the dream of better life.
In conclusion, I am the opinion that my country needs more land to be developed for industry purposes in order to make more workplaces and to build civil infrastructure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-13 | suyun | 66 | view |
| 2021-01-23 | Buggu | 60 | view |
| 2020-12-07 | anhung | 90 | view |
| 2020-03-17 | DaVa20011218 | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | mike.sharko | 60 | view |
- You have enough money to purchase either a house or a business. Which would you choose to buy? Give specific reasons to explain your choice. 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- In your country, is there more need for land to be left in its natural condition or is there more need for land to be developed for housing and industry? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- You have enough money to purchase either a house or a business. Which would you choose to buy? Give specific reasons to explain your choice. 80
- Mass media and the internet have caused people s attention spans to get shorter However the overall effect has been positive while people are less able to focus on one thing they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quan 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...f government will utilize more land for this purposes. Moreover, every industrial bu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...il export. Secondly, more industrial buildings means more supporting infrastructure li...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 287.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10452961672 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89591270306 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519163763066 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7765359273 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362554299894 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132505069017 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911198956523 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269604859037 0.150856017488 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661504341606 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.