Nowadays, building a new library is a very rare event, although we all familiar with how effectively it is used in our regular, everyday lives. In my humble opinion, with this large anonymous donation, the local government should build a new public library with an aestetical style.
Libraries provide education and research materials for lots of people, including students, researchers, professors and even for everyday readers. The collection of books place importance of academia in an environment. With this ease to access many materials locally would benefit education and research in the area. Additionally, the cultural impact on the local society is enormous, that it improves the wisdom in the area. Consequently, this would bring
There are students, where universities located, who needs place to study for their exam. A library is a great place for this act. Although universities have their own library, most of the times when exam weeks, there is no available seats to study. For example, in my university Middle East Technical University, I haven’t found any spot on campus library, so that I needed to visit alternative places, such as cafes or empty classrooms. Unfortunately, those alternative places wasn’t the best places to study, since their noise. Supposedly, if we had a local library, I would benefit from it by studying there. Also, in this way, many different students from different universities could have the opportunity to meet and socialize with each other.
Last but not least, if this library will be build concerning architectural styles, it would attracts lots of non-academic people to the place. For example, in my city Istanbul, there is a library, SALT Galata, which is a part public library. Yet, most people visit there just to take pictures with its iconic inside design.
Overall, I believe that the best option for building a public facility would be library for the reasons explained above. From the academic benefits to touristic frequecy, library would be the best case scenario for the building that will be build with this donation.
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 70
- TPO 18. Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Agree/ disagree? 83
- 55 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A person should never make an important decision alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- TOEFL T P O 2 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- The chart shows the average number of hours each day that Chinese American Turkish and Brazilian tourists spent doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August 2019 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the area. Consequently, this would bring There are students, where universities l...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...t by studying there. Also, in this way, many different students from different universities co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'attract'
Suggestion: attract
...ncerning architectural styles, it would attracts lots of non-academic people to the plac...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22848664688 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81367920586 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575667655786 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1767826036 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94444444444 5.45110844103 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136335489859 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468667397221 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546177440933 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880200200618 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476615336282 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.