bees
The reading and lecture are both about whether bees could exist and emerge in 200 million years ago or not. The passage presents three explanations to posit why, although some scientist believes bees create in 200 million years ago by discovering the fossilized nest, some of them do not accept the theory. The professor, however, refutes all of those explanations.
To begin with, the author of reading claims that no bee's fossils have found by archeologists until now, which exists more than 100 million years ago. Therefore, these fossilized nests are not associated with bees. Nevertheless, the professor opposes this claim by mentioning that the hypothesis is not convicting me since bees preserve in rare sort of trees which make particular resins. This kind of tree merely exists 100 million years, so; these are not common trees to maintain bees fossils 200 million years ago.
Secondly, the article posits that flowers discovered 125 million years ago, thereby bees have profound relation with flowers, which the only source of bee's food, thus bees unable to live without flowers. However, the professor maintains an opposite opinion that perhaps bees that exist before the flower's evolution could eat no flower plants including, Fern and other plants.
Third, the reading mentions that the nest is not the same as the modern nest, thereby lacking caps, thus it associated with wood-boring beetles. The professor, however, cast doubt on this claim by stating that the new nest has caps for the reason of protecting the nest from water. By more investigate, scientist proof that fossils have a particular ingredient which has the waterproof ability, so there is no need for caps.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-15 | saamaan | 90 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | YasamanEsml | 88 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | sahel | 76 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-18 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... some of them do not accept the theory. The professor, however, refutes all of thos...
^^^
Line 9, column 298, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'flowers'' or 'flower's'?
Suggestion: flowers'; flower's
...that perhaps bees that exist before the flowers evolution could eat no flower plants in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, kind of, sort of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19272727273 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51580130343 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589090909091 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1200225395 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287527296232 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111925381292 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112967879207 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192618602213 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130236155904 0.0443174109184 294% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.