Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals. Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the environment and suggest that the United States government should create new, much stricter regulations for handling and storing coal ash.
The reading argues that the US must take a strict and serious decision about the wast product which named coal ash. The author listed three factors in supporting this fact. However, the lecturer finds all the reasons dubious and presents some evidence to refute all the ideas.
First, the author proposes that environmental regulations already exist. For instance, they must utilize some material to prevent coal ashes contaminate other materials. In contrast, the speaker rebuts this reason by standing that it is not sophisticated and for doing this work they need to the new land which will significantly damage and contaminate drink water. Hence, the speaker refutes this idea.
Second, the author indicates that they are worried about recycling coal ash because perhaps people will be reluctant to purchase these recycled materials and think they are very dangerous. On the other hand, the speaker casts doubt on this issue and states that mercury is the poisonous material that safety is been recycling and it is unlikely to be afraid of the customer than buying it.
On the contrary, the author illustrated that the new strict rules will lead to extra
- TPO 48 integrated writing 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- for the successful development of the country, it is more important the government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. 76
- TPO 51 47
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lize some material to prevent coal ashes contaminate other materials. In contrast...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, for instance, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 30.3222958057 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 190.0 270.72406181 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13157894737 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47370660684 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621052631579 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3880306448 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136400223543 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472514776252 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558057440463 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716368519268 0.162205337803 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444430856283 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.