certify wood products
The reading and the lecture are both about how to encourge the ecologoical certifcation to wood companies in the United States. Whereas, the author of the reading states that it is uncommon that wood companies in the Unites States would meet a high ecologicla standards. In contrast, the speaker casts doubt on this point that made in the reading by providing three resaons.
First of all, according to the reading, American customers would neither pay that required attention nor valued this ecocertifcation label which presented as new idea by advertising. However, the speaker disputes this point. He mentioned that American would not treat these advertising in same way. In addition, He added they would pay more attention.
Secondly, the reading states that these ecocertified wood would be more costy in the sence of buying price. This partical reason for this curcumstance is that wood companies would pay more money to get the eco-label. Nevertheless, the speaker refutes this argument. He argues that American consumers are not foucsing alone on the price itself. They would not mind if the price increase by 5% for example in exchange of a good quality.
Finally, the article claims that some people believe that pursuing certification would not making wood business would not convince the US business in order to keep up with the rest of competing companies. However, the speaker claims that if the American goverment would pay more attention in this matter, thus more competting forghien companies would enter the United States wood business.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most serious problems in the world will be solved during my lifetime Use details and examples to support your answer 75
- memoir of Chevalier de Seingalt 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 60
- memoir of Chevalier de Seingalt 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reading American customers would neither pay that required attention nor valued t...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...xample in exchange of a good quality Finally the article claims that some people bel...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...e that pursuing certification would not making wood business would not convince the US...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld enter the United States wood business
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, for example, in addition, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13944223108 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59908178161 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513944223108 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 251.0 21.2450331126 1181% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1290.0 110.228320801 1170% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 251.0 21.698381199 1157% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 131.0 7.06452816374 1854% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0857004639345 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857004639345 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597690449995 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034866075171 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 128.3 13.3589403974 960% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -183.29 53.8541721854 -340% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 101.2 11.0289183223 918% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.01 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.29 8.42419426049 229% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 10.7273730684 541% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 102.4 10.498013245 975% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 11.2008830022 518% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.