The Chaco Structure and its purpose
The author and the lecturer talk about the purpose of "great houses" in New Mexico. The reading passage states that there is no proper explanation for the use of such buildings, and comes up with three assumptions based upon pieces of evidence found at a few particular locations. The lecturer, however, denies the argument by providing three reasons.
First, according to the reading passage, due to the big shape of the Chaco structure, it can possible that buildings must have been used for the residence of hundred families. Moreover, it also resembles apartment buildings in Taos, New Mexico, where many people live. The lecturer opposes the statement. He says that the given assumption is unreasonable because there are very few fireplaces inside the house to cook food for such a large number of families. According to the speaker, as per present design, it only possible for 10 families to prepare their meals.
Secondly, the Chaos building can be used for storing food. According to the writer, the Chaco people must have used the house for storing maize grains in order to maintain longer food supplies. Nevertheless, the speaker refutes the idea. He says that there is no evidence of maize found at the location. Therefore, it can not be said that the Chaco structure was used to store grains, otherwise, crop should have spilled on the floor or any other clue must be there to support the presence maize containers.
Lastly, the author mentions that buildings were used for ceremonies due to evidence of pots found at the location. He confirms the assumption by providing an example of Pueblo Alto, as one of the house. The professor, however, refutes this assumption. Apart from pot, other material were also present at the site such as construction material and tool, which cast doubt on the statement made by the author. Further, based on the evidence found, it can be possible that the Chaco structure was used as construction site and worker had used the pot for cooking their meal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-18 | ayumiyazaki | 3 | view |
| 2022-07-05 | ishi_jais | 3 | view |
| 2022-02-12 | Mona malik | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | aliyyevv | 3 | view |
| 2020-02-21 | zoi | 52 | view |
- Young people enjoy their life more than old people 66
- young people enjoy more than older people 66
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 50
- Rembrandt s Painting 73
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ce found at a few particular locations. The lecturer, however, denies the argument ...
^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... inside the house to cook food for such a large number of families. According to the speaker, as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.01324503311 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99109792285 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62058295563 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53115727003 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.1709263437 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0938029979077 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0246066563517 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041940602187 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0545209178691 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022383457831 0.0443174109184 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.