Chevalier
The author states in the reading that the memoir of Chevalier's life adventures is not accurate and he mentioned some additional parts to make it more fascinating. The lecturer, however, rebuts this statement by saying that all his writings are correct and they are counted as a reliable source of a historical source.
First of all, the author contends that Chevalier seemed to be so wealthy but on the other hand he used to borrow cash from others and these do not match together. The lecturer casts doubts on this by asserting that Chevalier was really rich but in the past, it took so much time to sell a product and to gain money. He argues that in the time he was waiting for cash arrivement he needed to borrow money to pay them back later.
Secondly, the author suggests that Chevalier mentioned all his dialogues with Voltaire. But the conversation was taken place so many times ago and as a result, the writing could not be true and accurate. The lecturer refutes this by saying that Chevalier used to take notes and kept them all and utilized them in the journal.
Finally, the writer believes that Chevalier could not escape the jail on his own and he needed to get help from other jailers who bribed him to get free. In contrast, the lecturer contends that other jailers had so many friends rather than Chevalier but they could not get away from the prison. In addition, according to some old vanishing documents soon after his escape, they repaired the ceiling of the prison. This indicates that it was something wrong with the ceiling that was related to the hole which he used it to run away.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 76 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | 200suranjan | 60 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Haleh Rezazadeh | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | joyce05 | 3 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | theprasad | 70 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, in addition, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62020905923 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37092076667 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.1844955376 49.2860985944 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.5 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243082488961 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102683635129 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889030310215 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162152461746 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348380075202 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.