Communal Online Eancyclopedia x Traditional Printed Encyclopedia
The reading passage and the lecture are about the communal online and the traditional printed encyclopedias.The author of the reading states that online encyclopedia have many flaws when it compares with the printed ones, but the lecturer does not agree. She says that online encyclopedia has been prejudice by ignorance and questions all three points presented.
First of all, the reading passage points out that online information is not as right as in printed ones, because is not collected by experts. Yet, non academic people can make changes. The lecturer questions this claim. She observes that both types of encyclopedias cannot be perfect, but the on-line has the advantage of tracking errors and easily correcting them. While printed ones remains with their mistakes for decades.
Secondly, the text contends that online version it is more exposed to hackers, that can create and delete information. The professor confirms this fact, but notes that online encyclopedias have some ways to protect their material. The first way is to make their crucial information in read only format, so no one can change it. Another way is by having specialised editors finding changes and eliminating malicious content.
Finally, the author explains that online encyclopedia’s content, focus on trivial and popular information, creating a false impression about what it is really important. The professor still opposes the argument. She remarks that traditional encyclopaedia have limited space, so the content chosen by the academics to fit in this space may not reflect what people wants to know. In contrast, the online version does not have this limitation providing more diversity of information, wich is the strongest advantage of this model.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | keisham | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | Dat_Nguyen | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-28 | MotherAstronaut | 85 | view |
- Summarize the points made in teh lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge specific points made in the reading.Dinosaurs were, in fact, endothermic animals. 90
- Franchise x Independent Business 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment – doing thins they like to do – rather than doing things they should do. 76
- Integrated Writing Task: Chaco Canyon: How the buildings were used? Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed on the reading passage. 90
- Soon technology will provide smart cars: that virtually drive themselves. Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge specific points made in the reading passage. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...d the traditional printed encyclopedias.The author of the reading states that onlin...
^^^
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clopedia has been prejudice by ignorance and questions all three points presented...
^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge points out that online information is not as right as in printed ones, because...
^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d easily correcting them. While printed ones remains with their mistakes for decades...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, while, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42335766423 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89602622097 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583941605839 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.399032125 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0666666667 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278351305424 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764589876732 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885715907163 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175979228472 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114333920437 0.0443174109184 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.