Dams
The article discusses fascinating topic pertaining to dams and provides three important reasons in support of its benefit. The professor opposes every reason mentioned in the reading passage and puts forward the following points.
First, the reading states that dams create positive impact on environment as it helps in formation of artificial lakes and also provide water for irrigation. The professor refutes this by stating that fishes suffer, as they lose their migration path, as water flow is diverted for construction of dams and also their reproduction is affected as they need fast stream flow of water and after dam is formed water flows slowly. Clearly disparity is seen between reading statements and the lecture discussion. Hence, it is clear that dam creates negative impact on fish.
Second, the reading avers that the electricity of equal amount is produced in comparison to coal base power plant without any harmful gas production. The professor provides opposite stand with the statement that dams often flood the surrounding area which damages the naturally occurring plants there, which gets rotten and produces harmful methane gas and also by destroying plants the capacity of absorbing carbon dioxide from atmosphere reduces which produces further harm. So, in short, we can say that artificial dam damages plants.
Third, the reading posits that construction of dam provides two sources of revenue, one - agricultural production via irrigation, second - electricity production, and this is more than the operational cost of dam. The professor provides information about property damage of the people residing near to dam as there is occasional flood situation nearby. We can argue that indeed the claim made in the reading is unsubstantiated and the professor proves with the opposite explanation.
In summary, both the reading and classroom discussion provide interesting information with regards to dam, a significant amount of evidence supports that dam has more harmful effect in comparison to benefits. Therefore, the reading fails to justify the claim towards dam construction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | Yash Mehta | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | m_aalaei | 76 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 75 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ify the claim towards dam construction.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, third, in short, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.01324503311 359% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50153846154 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82961718965 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.4555693304 49.2860985944 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399315407208 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161698798506 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114373253785 0.0662205650399 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24393648986 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883926653993 0.0443174109184 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.