Deforestation, forests, trees, clearing large areas of land
The article introduces the topic of deforestation, which is the concept of clearing large areas of forests of all trees. The writer of the article mainly discusses the advantages of deforestation and thinks there are plenty of benefits. However, the professor does not agree with this point of view. He thinks we should also consider the long-term consequences of deforestation, which he thoroughly explains during the lecture.
First of all, the author states that clearing large areas of land helps us to produce more food. The professor strongly disagrees with this argument. He mentions that we could also consider alternative ways of farming, which do not necessarily acquire cutting down trees and clearing forests. Thus, the lecturer strongly believes there are plenty of other ways to create food.
Furthermore, according to the author, the cleared land can be very useful to arrange new living spaces and new residential buildings. With the global population that has increased over the last few years, consequently, the demand for houses has also risen. In contrast, the professor thinks that we should not destroy the current ecosystem for our selfish economic needs. Moreover, he thinks it is irresponsible to simply cut down trees for our own welfare needs.
Lastly, the writer of the article mentions the forestry industry. If we would stop cutting down trees and shut the industry down, the employees in the forestry industry would not have a job anymore. Again, the lecturer believes there are flaws in this argument. He notices that all of the countries mentioned in the article are developing countries, so not representative of the western world. Additionally, the professor states that the forestry industry is quite a dangerous business field, and most of the money will go to the owners of the companies, instead of the actual employees.
In conclusion, it is clear that both the writer of the article and the lecturer have conflicting views about clearing forests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-09 | Nina Tsarevich | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | chaithu067 | 65 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | chaithu067 | view | |
| 2022-10-18 | Sumilak | 3 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | SahilJain | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thoroughly explains during the lecture. First of all, the author states that cle...
^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...flaws in this argument. He notices that all of the countries mentioned in the article are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nflicting views about clearing forests.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, thus, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 321.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21183800623 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79937701638 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517133956386 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5359000905 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9444444444 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968704423716 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0244289665496 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400965952045 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0431016770941 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311249002962 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.