Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In today's sophisticated world, in comparison to the past, many things, including the importance of different jobs, have changed in various aspects. Some people think that teachers were more valued in the past. On the other hand, others believe in the opposite. I, personally, concur with the former group for a couple of reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, with the advent of technology and progress of the world, the number of educated people has increased compared to the past. In the past, there were limited educated ones, so that doctors and teachers were only well-educated people in each society. In this circumstance, it is expected that ordinary people profoundly appreciated people who were working in these fields. Indeed, people heartily admired them because they were aware of the difference between the level of knowledge of themselves and educated people's like teachers. To make it more clear, in the past, the majority of people had some regular occupation such as agriculture, selling commodities, and deriving, which did not need any academic study. Therefore, in such a society, teaching was a prestigious vocation, and people intensively honoured teachers. However, in the current era, there are many professionals in different fields that are working on remarkable jobs positions such as astronomers, scientists, and engineers.
Second, in the modern era where we live there, educational facilities are growing up day-to-day. In the past, people resorted to the teachers for everything they wanted to learn, however, nowadays, people access to a wide variety of the precious resources such as equipped libraries, online courses, countless types of educational applications which ease the learning process effectively. Therefore, in this situation, that people are less dependent on the teachers in the learning process, it is logically that teaching is not as outstanding as it used to be. For example, learning online may be was unimaginable in the past, however, these days, people thanks to immense progress of the technology, can learn everything using self-study which it shows the fade of the role of teachers in today's world. In fact, in my opinion, people value on those whom they are more dependent on them. The fewer dependence people feel to someone, the less value they put on his or her position.
All in all, with the two mentioned reasons into account, I firmly assert that people appreciate teachers less than previous. In other words, teaching is not as crucial as it was in the past because not only there are more well-educated individuals in the society, but also because of the presence of plentiful educational resources, people need to teachers less than previous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-30 | saeedpanahi | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-30 | saeedpanahi | 80 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | mina.gt | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 73
- In 20 years from now on students will not use printed books any more 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- tpo61 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in fact, such as, first of all, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 30.3222958057 254% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2315.0 1373.03311258 169% => OK
No of words: 442.0 270.72406181 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23755656109 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88454795414 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 145.348785872 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515837104072 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 419.366225166 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 18.0 2.5761589404 699% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.131484206 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.842105263 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2631578947 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.31578947368 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 4.33554083885 346% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171613009565 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063165952725 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542655292382 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120905754519 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205104018112 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 63.6247240618 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.