During the lecture, it was discussed research that showed the pros and cons of teamwork in one company. The opinion of the author contradicts the reading passage’s ideas.
The lecturer claims that some members of the group were not active participants, but eventually the recognition was assigned to the team as a whole. The reading passage claims that teamwork opens more possibilities for improvement for the project by the valuable range of knowledge and skill each member can possess. But in the lecture, we hear that work in groups took more time even on discussion steps of the projects, because more people need more time to find an agreement first.
The professors also mentioned that some people had a more essential impact on the work than others. Hence it was just an opinion with the plan or ideas, while other people’s views were ignored. Moreover, in the end, whether the project failed or succussed, the group result was validated, not individuals. On the contrary, in the text the author claims that some people can contribute and be highly recognized for their work, but not as a team.
Thus, statements made by the author in the text are countered with relevant evidence by the lecturer in the aforementioned way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-21 | alicegreen13 | 70 | view |
- Should children spend most of the time playing and studying or they should be required to help the family with household chores, like cooking and cleaning 70
- Some companies decide not to permit employees to reply the e mail or text associated with the work in the holiday or on the weekend Some people think that this policy will improve the satisfaction of the employees While others argue that banning the reply 67
- At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some un 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People can t be happy with what they have they always want something new or different Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- In the future, students may have the choice of studying at home by using technology such as computers or television or of studying at traditional schools. Which would you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...sential impact on the work than others. Hence it was just an opinion with the plan or...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the lecturer in the aforementioned way.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, moreover, so, thus, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 1373.03311258 65% => OK
No of words: 180.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92222222222 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69132121393 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6082693913 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.75 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11946851409 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497363535528 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286199671132 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07875358594 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117389094415 0.0443174109184 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...sential impact on the work than others. Hence it was just an opinion with the plan or...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the lecturer in the aforementioned way.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, moreover, so, thus, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 1373.03311258 65% => OK
No of words: 180.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92222222222 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69132121393 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605555555556 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6082693913 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.75 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11946851409 0.272083759551 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497363535528 0.0996497079465 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286199671132 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07875358594 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0117389094415 0.0443174109184 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.