Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they answer the
specific problems presented in the reading passage.
The lecturer and the author of the passage offer two opposite views on the accuracy of the picture of Rembrandt called Portrait an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet. The author of the articles elaborates on doubts that mentioned portrait could be work of the Rembrandt; but the lecturer provides strong evidence from research that was conducted to attack each claim made in the reading.
According to the text, first reason why this particular painting could not be performed by Rembrandt is that dressing was inconsistent fur collar was suggesting to wearing only by luxurious people, but the other cloth was not appropriate to that style. Author suggests that painter could not possibly draw it because he was always focused on details. The lecturer explains that scientists studied this work with the current technologies and explained that that piece of portrait the fur collar was drawn only a hundred years ago to change picture for selling for higher precise, probably.
The second passage claims that Rembrandt was the master of light but in this work light and shadow don’t fit, and in his previous works no one could mention this issue, so critics suggest it is not his picture. This contradicts what the lecturer indicates. Scientists was capable to remove that additional piece of fur collar and saw that it was a usual collar of the servant, and the light shadow trouble is disappeared, so it was definitely someone’s trick.
This portrait is absolutely work of the Rembrandt because even the suggestion that it contained from a few pieces of wood which was not fair. The professor addresses that with help of research it was shown that this work was changes by someone adding another piece of wood, when evident says that it was the same wood from which was done another picture.
To sum up, the clear evidence provided from the study support idea that some one tried to change to picture for some purpose.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they answer the specific problems presented in the reading passage 3
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which ONE of the following three actions is MOST useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community? Why?- Plant trees and create 76
- Is it better to work on a project in a group or to work by yourself Give reasons or examples from your life events etc 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today's world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 73
- Some tourists prefer to travel to places that are very popular with other tourists in the places There are usually large crowds of visitors waiting to see a famous attraction such as a monument or historical buildings All of the tourists prefer to travel 79
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'adds'.
Suggestion: adds
...n that this work was changes by someone adding another piece of wood, when evident say...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ovided from the study support idea that some one tried to change to picture for some pur...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91717791411 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48726857202 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503067484663 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8904657606 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.727272727 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6363636364 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0601189949803 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308636985029 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337817366297 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0377748434542 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039373592027 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'adds'.
Suggestion: adds
...n that this work was changes by someone adding another piece of wood, when evident say...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...ovided from the study support idea that some one tried to change to picture for some pur...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91717791411 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48726857202 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503067484663 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8904657606 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.727272727 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6363636364 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0601189949803 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308636985029 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337817366297 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0377748434542 0.162205337803 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039373592027 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.