electronic medical records
The reading passage and lecture are both regarding using electronic medical record. The writer states that there are benefits to electronic records. The lecturer casts doubt on them, implying that these advantages can’t be justified for the following reasons.
To begin with, even though the author suggests that it can reduce costs since there is no need for storing and copying papers, the lecturer argues that it is a misconception. This is because there might still be some doctors keep using papers for other purposes like emergency. Thereby, we can’t significantly save money by harnessing electronic records.
Secondly, according to the author, thanks to the standardization of forms, electronic records can prevent several human errors such as poor handwriting and improper transcription of data. Conversely, the professor believes that there are weaknesses in author’s position. She mentions that some doctors still document records with pen and paper and some medical staffs who are supposed to transport handwriting scripts to electronic data can make mistakes in identifying and interpreting doctor’s scripts. Accordingly, she disagrees with the author.
Last but not least, the author points out that electronic records can be conducive to medical research, which researchers can readily access to needed information in large amount of data collection. Nevertheless, the lecturer claims that researcher probably still have difficulty in acquiring records. Since there are strict law restricting people from gaining private information, people need to follow complicated procedures and obtain permission from patients to get medical records. As a result, the lecturer rules out this aiding advantage.
To summarize, both the writer and lecturer hold conflicting views about the advantages of electronic medical records.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | Vivian Chang | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | shekoo20 | 80 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-10 | mraru | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ere are benefits to electronic records. The lecturer casts doubt on them, implying ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, conversely, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75457875458 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92794768939 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611721611722 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.0611368037 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.733333333 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320116883984 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108555504442 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128999816348 0.0662205650399 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198139183389 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863674249518 0.0443174109184 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.2367328918 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.