fine lines could not represent that the dinosaur had feather. The lecturer, nonetheless, refutes the author's explanations by offering three counterclaims.
First, the passage posits that after dying, the animal's skin might have decomposed into fibers. Therefore, such patterns could be an indication of skin fibers. The lecturer, in contrast, takes this view that none of fossiles discovered at the same area, had such fine lined on fos
Actually, both the passage and the lecturer discuss about fossils skeleton of a dinosaur named Sinosauropteryx. Although shape of the remained fossil show that the dinosaur had feather, the critics brings three hypothesizes in the passage for dismissing the claims. the professor puts those reasons under question in order to prove that the mentioned criticisms aren't convincing.
First, as the passage illustrated decomposition of dinosaur skin caused such a shape that defect people to believe dinosaurs have feather; nonetheless, the lecturer doesn’t reinforce the idea by adding the thought that fossils of other animals which are found in that area preserve so beautiful and complete that confirms us to accept the fact that dinosaur had feather.
Next, the passage expresses that those extra part of dinosaurs was frail because remaining frails as a fossil as more possible; however, the professor doesn’t validate the mentioned claim by indicating the fact that the component of feather and frail demonstrate us that they were feather.
Finally, the passage believes that the position of feathers couldn’t help dinosaur. they not only didn't contribute dinosaur to fly but they also couldn’t be conserved from adverse climate. Conversely, the lecturer rejects the idea by exemplifies another bird that has same feather and can fly; besides, the colorful dinosaur shows us they definitely had diverse feathers on their body.
- TPO 43 : Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.— Wait until the clas 76
- TPO 48- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- TOEFL T P O 46 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- integrated essay from TPO 16 85
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades. Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s, Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is. Thus th 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...ained fossil show that the dinosaur had feather, the critics brings three hypothesizes ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...ained fossil show that the dinosaur had feather, the critics brings three hypothesizes ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... the passage for dismissing the claims. the professor puts those reasons under ques...
^^^
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... to prove that the mentioned criticisms arent convincing. First, as the passage ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...defect people to believe dinosaurs have feather; nonetheless, the lecturer doesn't...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...us to accept the fact that dinosaur had feather. Next, the passage expresses that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...us to accept the fact that dinosaur had feather. Next, the passage expresses that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 287, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...and frail demonstrate us that they were feather. Finally, the passage believes tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...f feathers couldn't help dinosaur. they not only didnt contribute dinosaur to f...
^^^^
Line 13, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ldn't help dinosaur. they not only didnt contribute dinosaur to fly but they als...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 284, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
... exemplifies another bird that has same feather and can fly; besides, the colorful dino...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, nonetheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61261261261 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87379267868 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.6701059015 49.2860985944 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.75 110.228320801 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189274977631 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869387278436 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611342155626 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118770596068 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478715292659 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.3589403974 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.8541721854 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.0289183223 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.