fossil market
According to the reading, the commercial market for fossils, particularly of dinosaurs, has negatively affected science and also public interests in fossils; however, the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the reading. She believes that the advantages of fossil market outweigh its disadvantages.
Firstly, the reading asserts that the private collectors’ access to fossils has restrained the public to view them. The lecturer refutes this argument by explaining that the commercial fossil market offers the opportunity to schools and libraries to purchase unique fossils and then exhibit them for public viewing.
Secondly, the reading states that this would limit the scientists’ access to fossils; as a result, they cannot study the fossils and thereby make scientific discoveries. The lecturer, on the other hand, notes that every fossil has to be identified by a scientist or an expert before entering the fossil market. Therefore, the scientists have the chance to do all the necessary experiments and tests.
Finally, the reading claims that untrained fossil collectors often destroy the valuable evidences in the environment where fossils are discovered. In contrast, the lecturer posits that if it was not for the collectors’ efforts, many fossils would have not even been found in the first place. Taking that into consideration, it is better to have some information about fossils than to have not at all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssil market outweigh its disadvantages. Firstly, the reading asserts that the pr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as to, in contrast, as a result, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48878923767 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01345958786 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605381165919 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9155874948 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.4 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.3 7.06452816374 217% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450714688403 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183830887063 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132435773268 0.0662205650399 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272890165289 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383769408927 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.