fossils of ancient organisms
Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether or not selling and buying fossils by private collectors is advantageous. While the reading challenges that fossils private collection is unfortunate not only for science but also for the general public, The lecture, on the other hand, refutes the point made by the author and states that fossil private collection has many advantages that could outweigh its disadvantages.
First and foremost, fossils' private collections will make it difficult for common and the public to see fossils and make them less accessible to be seen. Therefore, people will have no more interest to see or study fossils. On the other hand, the professor argues this point by claiming that fossil collectors make it possible for the general public to get exposed to fossils and study them. According to the professor, schools and museums will purchase fossils routinely from private collectors and demonstrate them in public.
Moreover, the reading claims that it is crucial that scientists are likely to miss out on the opportunity to know important outbreaks and discoveries about fossils because the fossils buyers would have spent millions of dollars to own the rarest and most important fossils. However, the professor casts doubts on this point by saying it is not realistic because the only scientist is able to examine and testify fossils. Even though, if fossils are owned by private buyers it should have been tested by archeologists. For this reason, it is unlikely that scientists will miss the opportunity to discover a new for important findings in fossils discoveries.
Finally, the lecture refutes the last point made in the reading by stating that if not through commercial collectors who are mostly able to unearth important fossils many fossils will go undiscovered. For the reason that scientists and universities missing the potential and the equipment needed to carry such fossils. Nevertheless, the author of the reading only states that commercial fossils collectors do not have adequate training to handle unearthed fossils. The author explains that it is plausible that important documentation and careful attention to fieldwork and surroundings will be missed because of inexperienced collectors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-20 | kagi | 75 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | hhzz | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | servatan7 | 90 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | ghazalsaed1995 | 83 | view |
- TPO 30 Burning mirrors 80
- tpo 30 burning mirrors weapon 80
- Technology has made children less creative than before 81
- TPO 35In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M. Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book (manuscript) written on vellum (vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper). The "Voynich manuscript," a 80
- tpo 7 Eco certified 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...oth the reading and the lecture discuss whether or not selling and buying fossils by private c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...e not only for science but also for the general public, The lecture, on the other hand, refute...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 336, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...sil collectors make it possible for the general public to get exposed to fossils and study the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 7.30242825607 260% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 354.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40395480226 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84334628308 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480225988701 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 572.4 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4916928012 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.642857143 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185462992663 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779429649922 0.0996497079465 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530673601761 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128639521316 0.162205337803 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181824239263 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.