Franchise benefits
The author of the reading and lecture both talk about a franchise, which is the kind of commercial licenses allowing those new traders to use its name and its products for identified rate from the total sales.
The reading passage provides three merits of using this pattern of investment and the lecture cast doubt on the author claims and provide three demerits.
First, the author of the reading posits that Franchise license would be beneficial to overcome the obstacles of starting new business such as dealing with honest supplier as well as the high cost required for running a new business. The lecture contradict this point directly. She believes that a finding of the recent study in this matter reveals that this kind of business is not effective enough. She states that owners of new business are forced to buy some specific products with a substantially expensive price comparing to their price in the market.
Second, while the reading passage asserts this kind of license will be effective in saving the money spent on advertisement, as the new business is still unknown. This argument is rebutted directly by the lecture. She claims that the sales rated which is roughly 6% of the sales is mostly high. Moreover, she points that the company will only advertise its products and the new trader will not obtain as benefits as the company achieves.
Finally, the author of the reading states that Franchise is much more secure than running a new business. He argues that the rate of establishing a new commercial project is relatively higher comparing to those with Franchise license. The lecture, on the other hand, challenged this point by stating that even though Franchise is less risky than starting new business, it is not secure enough. She put forth the idea that the article did not mention the third alternative option that is considered much more effective than those suggested by the author. She claims that the new trader can buy a previous business, which has already a name in the market, and its products has already familiar for most customers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-30 | predatoros | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | predatoros | 85 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-12 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-10 | ayumiyazaki | 75 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ss such as dealing with honest supplier as well as the high cost required for runn...
^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'contradicts'.
Suggestion: contradicts
...for running a new business. The lecture contradict this point directly. She believes that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'third', 'well', 'while', 'kind of', 'such as', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225464190981 0.261695866417 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.159151193634 0.158904122519 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0954907161804 0.0723426182421 132% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0742705570292 0.0435111971325 171% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0344827586207 0.0277247811725 124% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135278514589 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0503978779841 0.0370669169778 136% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51202658247 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0132625994695 0.0208969081088 63% => OK
Particles: 0.0026525198939 0.00154638098197 172% => OK
Determiners: 0.143236074271 0.128158765124 112% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0132625994695 0.0158828679856 84% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106100795756 0.0114777025283 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2082.0 1645.83664459 127% => OK
No of words: 350.0 271.125827815 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94857142857 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.374285714286 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288571428571 0.287516216867 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185714285714 0.187439937562 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.102857142857 0.113142543107 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51202658247 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482857142857 0.539623497131 89% => OK
Word variations: 50.006076661 53.8517498576 93% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.3333333333 21.7502111507 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2449997512 49.3711431718 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.8 132.220823453 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 21.7502111507 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 52.1904761905 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.53465346535 1.90840788429 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0616163368263 0.451937469235 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115825027928 0.142949733639 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.047793374458 0.0787303798458 61% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.641534834041 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.177900095537 0.139662658121 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296443259971 0.21790590567 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378787928666 0.0871468918476 43% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.418309258126 0.414875509568 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.110745543185 0.0530846634433 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0368542443089 0.332364718235 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239529611255 0.0446026805963 54% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.