https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDYdLyYO5jw
First Question
The reading passage and lecture by the professor presented here both discusses the painting attribution to James McNeill Whistler. The author of the passage believes that the painting of young woman in long white dress is surely of the Whistler’s. The professor in the lecture, however, found the claim implausible and presents some arguments to refute them all.
Firstly, the author of the reading passage suggests that shortly after the death of Whistler there was an exhibition conducted by his friend, where he attributed the painting to the Whistler. On the flip side, the lecturer challenges the proposition contending that although the exhibition consists of the Whistlers painting, there are many more paintings of other painters too. Hence, lecturer believes that it will be implausible to attribute Whistler without any ground.
Secondly, the author claims that woman portrayed in the painting was same as of his one painting “Symphony in the White”. Furthermore, the style of Whistlers is also matching to his other paintings. Also, it resembles the use of monochromatic palates used by the Whistlers in pervious paintings. In contrast, the lecturer refutes the claim by maintaining that the woman and monochromatic patterns were very popular among the painters those days and hence that painting may be painted by others.
Finally, the author argues that the signature mark of Whistlers painting: butterfly is also present on the painting. On the other hand, the lecturer claims that butterfly mark is placed after many years painting has been painted. Also, lecturer signifies that the mark must be on the upper left corner than on bottom right corner. Thus, it must be the case of forgery.
In the conclusion, author of the reading passage and the professor in the lecture have equally attempted to make their argument for and against the claim. Further analysis of the evidences will help to bring out the conclusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-09 | Manish766491 | 3 | view |
| 2018-11-10 | nicktyranov | 3 | view |
| 2015-12-05 | Caiyuan | 80 | view |
| 2015-12-03 | Caiyuan | 90 | view |
- Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 81
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's rec 59
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDYdLyYO5jwFirst Question 3
- Scandals are useful because they focus on attention on problems in a way that no speakers and reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, b 79
- Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...dress is surely of the Whistler's. The professor in the lecture, however, foun...
^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r many years painting has been painted. Also, lecturer signifies that the mark m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28846153846 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81330664523 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1219201799 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.125 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.