Painting of Rembrandt
The article states that the famous portrait of an elderly woman was not created by Rembrandt and it mentions three main reasons. However, the lecturer opposes the view and believes that the famous painting was created by Rembrandt. He refutes all the three reasons of the reading.
First, the reading states that the dress of woman in the portrait is not consistent. She wore white linen cap, which actually used by the servant at that time and she wore a luxurious coat. However, the lectures refutes opposes this point by stating that a fore collar was added with the original painting and it made the painting inconsistent.
Second, the article claims that Rembrandt’s work embodied the mixture of light and dark, which is absent in this painting. The lecturer disagrees with this claim by saying that because of addition of fore color the mixture of dark and light had been destroyed.
Finally, the reading avers that the back of the paining was made by adding several wood panel, which is not usually seen at Rembrandt’s work. However, the lecturer opposes this claim by saying that the extra wood panel was added with the original painting later because of inserting fore collar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-13 | Anurag96 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | himanshu186 | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | himanshu186 | 60 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 90 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | ishi_jais | 73 | view |
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what the field of history is 60
- R.robustus was the active hunter of dinosaur 65
- It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 73
- zoos importance 75
- In a study of reading habits of Leeville citizens conducted by the University of Leeville, most respondents said they preferred literary classics as reading material. However, a follow-up study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of book 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...later because of inserting fore collar.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99502487562 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50785750662 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497512437811 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1777873696 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239594345629 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954065613632 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102666010517 0.0662205650399 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146654125755 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653762270904 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.