The populations of many fish species are rapidly disappearing due to overfishing and pollution. There are many ways to address this issue, and one of the most popular is aquaculture, also known as fish farming. Raising fish in a controlled environment has many advantages in addition to providing a stable supply of food. Here are some of the most important reasons that aquaculture should be widely adopted.
First, aquaculture can help to protect coastal areas. The majority of fish farms are built on or near coastlines as they require clean seawater to operate. So, the farmers are very careful about keeping their environment clean. In addition, the farms often take up land that would otherwise be used for industry or housing, both of which generate large amounts of pollution. By occupying this land, fish farms would keep the coastal areas cleaner.
Second, aquaculture is good for local economies. Many of the regions that are best suited to aquaculture are located in poor countries that have high unemployment rates. Fish farming is intensive work that requires many people to function smoothly. Much of the labor is manual and unskilled, so anyone can do it with a little training. Therefore, creating fish farms would provide much-needed jobs to the communities where they are built.
Third, aquaculture relieves pressure on wild populations of fish. Many species of fish have declined to dangerously small populations, so they must be protected from going extinct. Creating a new and dependable supply of fish would reduce the need for fishing. If enough fish farms are constructed, they could replace the wild fish that are currently being caught and consumed. That would allow wild fish populations to recover and prevent them from being overfished again.
The author and the lecturer discuss the advantages and disavantages of aquaculture. The author of the reading passage provide three reasons to explain the ways in which aquaculture will helpful to ecosystem and provide employment. The lecturer disagrees. He gave three counter arguments and believes that fish farming might have adverse effects.
According to the reading, the author says that aquaculture will help to protect coastal areas. Earlier the coastal areas had large number of industries and housing which increases the pollution, while aquaculture will ensure that enviornment is clean. The professor believes that there is a flaw in the author argument. He claims that dramatic change in ecosystem will change the habitate drastically. He gave the example of magroove forest which are present in the coastal region to prevent erosion. If it is removed it will have harmful consquences.
Secondly, the author suggests that building fish farming will help the community to solve the problem of unemployment. He feels that the fish farming require unskilled work and require large man power for smooth functioning. Hence, this will provide more employment opportunities. However, the the lecturer asserts that the aquaculture will reduce the traditional jobs like fishing in the coastal region, which is promary job for many of the people. Therfore, it will eventually reduce the number of jobs and increase unemployment.
Finally, the author claims that fish farming will reduce pressure on wild population for fish. Establishing the fish farms will create a new and dependent supply of fish and hence reduce the need for farming. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that aquaculture will increase the pressure on wild fish and eventually lead to increase in number of fish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-20 | memi00 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-28 | devvratjoshi | 68 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | New_account | 73 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise actions and ignore negative ones 50
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 60
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 67
- Men and Women 16
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 52
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ul to ecosystem and provide employment. The lecturer disagrees. He gave three count...
^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the coastal region to prevent erosion. If it is removed it will have harmful cons...
^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...more employment opportunities. However, the the lecturer asserts that the aquaculture w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...more employment opportunities. However, the the lecturer asserts that the aquaculture w...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
... the need for farming. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that aquaculture will increas...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39145907473 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77496565594 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483985765125 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2646524335 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1666666667 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6111111111 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197175791063 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648973569482 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722278971435 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132358365996 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874509967232 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.