pros and cons of the "let it burn" policy in the case of Yellowstone park
The reading and the lecture are both about a policy under the name of "let it burn" which states it is better to the forest fire burns itself out. However, the author of the reading claims that the forest fire caused catastrophic damage to the Yellowstone, the lecturer believes the fire is a natural phenomenon and this policy is not destruction but creative.
First, both the article and the lecture argue the fire and its effect on the vegetation and plant habitat. The passage points to destroying vegetation and small plants as the results of the fire. Also, it asserts the forest fire made the Yellowstone to a wilderness land. In contrast, the lecturer explains after the fire new plants were colonized in that region which made the diversity of vegetation even more. On the basis of the lecture, although the forest fire destroyed trees and scorched acres, small plants were grown after the fire which could grow on open and shaded space. In addition, seeds which needed an abundant heat to germinate obtained an opportunity to grow.
Second, the article as well as the talk discusses the effects of adopting the above-mentioned policy on animals. Accordingly, the passage asserts a group of animals escaped from the fire, and another group could not escape and annihilated. The author of the passage also points to destructing animals habitat and food chains as the impacts of this policy. On the contrary, the lecturer states animals can recover themselves in such situations and this devastating impact can encourage new habitats for living small species such as rabbits and hares. The existence of new species leads to thrive predators and boost food chains.
Finally, the essay believes that the forest fire reduced the visitors of the Yellowstone park as a tourist attraction, and businesses that leveraged on the park visitors got in trouble. According to the lecture, this idea was true if the fire happened every year. However, it was a once-in-time event and it was also the result of a combination of several factors such as low rainfall, accumulation of dry undergrowth, and unusual wind. Therefore, it cannot be mentioned that these results occur frequently and it was also clear that lots of tourists have visited Yellowstone park years afterward.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-19 | himanshu186 | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | himanshu186 | 83 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | alicegreen13 | 70 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | Mahimoon | 3 | view |
| 2021-07-24 | Mahimoon | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...minate obtained an opportunity to grow. Second, the article as well as the talk ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, in addition, in contrast, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 7.30242825607 260% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 377.0 270.72406181 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70101817084 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503978779841 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 600.3 419.366225166 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1828813962 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.588235294 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47058823529 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106233993394 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0332794122993 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530781286522 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681566954545 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528166761399 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.