Pterosaurs
In the passage, the writer enumerates why pterosaurs are incapable of powered flight. Oppositely, the lecture explains that there is a great capability that pterosaurs can power flight for some reasons.
To devastate the first reason in the passage, which is pterosaurs are reptiles, the lecture states that pterosaurs have hair. Nowadays, reptiles are all cold-blooded. So they won’t have a quick metabolism, which leads to an obstacle in powered flights. On the other hand, the lecture states that hairs were found on the skin of the pterosaurs, which provides evidence that pterosaurs are warm-blooded animals, further knowing that they could do powered flights.
The lecture also asserts that the passage is baseless to claim that pterosaurs have a heavyweight. The size of the pterosaurs could not decide their weight. Although the size of the pterosaurs was gigantic, their bones were hollow. This means that the weight of the pterosaurs is light. With their light body, the pterosaurs are capable of powered flight.
After explaining the first two reasons are wrong, the lecture starts to deal with the last assumption of the passage. The passage claims that pterosaurs have small and weak muscles. But the lecture explains that pterosaurs could walk fast because pterosaurs are like bats, which both walk on four legs. So pterosaurs are capable of powered flight.
- Decison alone 3
- the Chaco Canyon 3
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible 2 Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- Pterosaurs 60
- boys and girls 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26818181818 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63988401323 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513636363636 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6490095921 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.2666666667 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 7.06452816374 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504256006853 0.272083759551 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22498618745 0.0996497079465 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127252348101 0.0662205650399 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353481503678 0.162205337803 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887283840869 0.0443174109184 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.