purpose of the cave paintings of Lascaux
Both the passage and the lecture are about the possible purpose of the cave paintings of Lascaux. The author suggests three considerations to support the claim that these paintings are made to guarantee the prosperity of hunting actions. On the other hand, the professor is not convinced of this and casts doubt on each of these theories presented in the passage. Having categorically rejected the theories, he is of the opinion that there is little support for each of these theories.
To begin with, the author averts that since the animals which were mainly hunted by the painters are the principal subject of the painting, therefore, they serve to be the aim of painting. To prove his notion, the author alludes to the fact that most of the animals are hurt by arrows and depictions mostly refer to seasonal migration of the animal which was very important to the hunters. This specific argument is challenged by the speaker. The professor is of the opinion that some fundamental animals which were hunt normally by that people are not depicted whereas animals that were not hunt by them are pictured which put forth to the idea that hunting is not the subject of paintings. Also, the lecturer averts that the wounded animals cannot prove the mentioned argument.
Secondly, the writer suggests that drawings of human are mostly with the head of animals. The prehistorians used to hide themselves from animals with the head of the hunts. In contrast, the professor opposes this notion by mentioning that the humans in the drawings are horizontal, seems to have slept which repudiates the claim that they are in the trenches of hunting. Moreover, The lecturer mention that since there is no more evidence besides the human picture, scholars cannot accurately interpret the drawings.
Finally, The writer refers to the commonly belief that depictions are associated to the ritual ceremonies to help the hunters win the hunting by their magical power. The professor, contarstly, is of the opinion that the drawings may have the other magical power. He states that since the prehistorians used to believe that the spirit of the gone people live in the animals body, they produce these paintings as a gateway to communicate with the gone ancestors through ceremonies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-15 | Negin Nasiri | 81 | view |
| 2021-11-02 | zahra.tmmm | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | cc919 | 95 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | farshad_hom | 90 | view |
| 2021-08-24 | farshad_hom | 80 | view |
- many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate 73
- advantages and disadvantages of genetically modified trees 80
- summarize the point in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points in the passage. 3
- The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- were dinosaurs feathered 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 517, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hunted'.
Suggestion: hunted
...hat some fundamental animals which were hunt normally by that people are not depicte...
^^^^
Line 2, column 593, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hunted'.
Suggestion: hunted
... depicted whereas animals that were not hunt by them are pictured which put forth to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 30.3222958057 198% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1373.03311258 138% => OK
No of words: 377.0 270.72406181 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01856763926 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60330199805 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474801061008 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 419.366225166 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8463407508 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5625 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06452816374 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0964206254193 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417472429214 0.0996497079465 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129710170257 0.0662205650399 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683782578249 0.162205337803 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982609755925 0.0443174109184 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.