Question:Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The lecture and the reading both are related to the possible reason behind the Lambeisaurs' big bony crests. Although, the writer of the reading stands on the position that there are some possibilities for the actual function of those crests, the professor in the lecture dismisses all the speculations provided by the writer. The lecturer continues to say that some firm problems decrease the likelihood of those theories.
To begin with, the passage claims that those crests could be used for smelling. The professor rejects this idea with some strong reasons. While the writer feels that there is some similarity between the structure of the nose bones of modern animals and mentioned crests, the professor describes that in modern animals, the nose is backed by well-developed brain. That brain contains required nerves in order to process information. However, in Lambeosaur's, we see some under-developed brain; so it cannot be a probable explanation.
Secondly, the reading and the lecture both discuss the function of cooling in crests. The reading assert that, like Stegosaurs, those crests would have increased the body surface area to facilitate the cooling procedure. By contrast, the professor points out that in Stegosaurs, there are some bony plates that can effectively increase the body surface, but this is not true about Labbeosaur. He goes on to state that the existance of only one small crest wil not have any advantage for that aim.
Finally, the writer and the man in the listening talks about the role of crests in making sound ability. Although, the reading includes some evidence to theorize the role of crests in sound making, the professr refutes them. The professor says that all of the animals like them have good hearing skills. Then it would be not true only in thes animals.
- Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 93
- rendan the Navigator was an Irish priest who lived in the 6th century He is most famous for embarking on a voyage in search of the mythical Island of the Blessed The details of Brendan s voyage recorded as stories in old manuscripts suggest to some that B 3
- Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of proposals involve 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...ction of cooling in crests. The reading assert that, like Stegosaurs, those crests wou...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... evidence to theorize the role of crests in sound making, the professr refutes th...
^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r refutes them. The professor says that all of the animals like them hvae a good of hearin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07023411371 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66166109251 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535117056856 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.023588186 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0927286511575 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317468852703 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028804688714 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0555393894758 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206797823441 0.0443174109184 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.