Rambrandt painting
The speaker contradicts the passage points with regards to three different point’s coat details, shadow mistake and third is wood panel. The passage strongly denies that the painting does not belong to Rembrandt painter because of aforementioned reasons.
Firstly, speaker points out that, as per the passage women from painting was poor and she is wearing coat and great painter like her will never do this big mistake. However this, according to the him, is a misconception. In reality, he explicates that fur coat was painted later on main painting because pigment analysis and X-ray images proved that color used for painting was of different time period. Thus, he unequivocally negates the information given in the passage.
Secondly, he opposes the information given in the passage regarding light and shadow as well. he clarifies that in practice, coat was painted later and if we remove coat from painting we can clearly see that she was wearing simple cloth and that illuminates proper light of facial expressions.
Thirdly, he denies the validity of another point that wooden panel made by attaching wood pieces was not style of painter because she used uniform wood for her other painting. With regards to this point speaker contradicts that like coat the extra wood panel was attached to the original painting to preserve the painting. according to speaker there is original wood panel bellow existing panel. this was same as other single wood of painting.
Hence in conclusion, the speaker lucidly substantiates her point of view with cogency and states that addition of coat and extra wood panel was added to increase the value of painting.
- novel reader decrease 80
- You are planning to study abroad. What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Many of the world s cities are currently facing a serious housing shortage What are some of the reasons for this shortage and what solutions can you suggest 68
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a positive or negative development? 60
- #6 If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ike her will never do this big mistake. However this, according to the him, is a miscon...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'him'?
Suggestion: the; him
...big mistake. However this, according to the him, is a misconception. In reality, he ex...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...age regarding light and shadow as well. he clarifies that in practice, coat was pa...
^^
Line 6, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: According
...inal painting to preserve the painting. according to speaker there is original wood panel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 397, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ginal wood panel bellow existing panel. this was same as other single wood of painti...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...me as other single wood of painting. Hence in conclusion, the speaker lucidly subs...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16236162362 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59482807114 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505535055351 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9090009411 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.615384615 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135579742953 0.272083759551 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533559262957 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750689464783 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844123238325 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065415443986 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.