The reading passage and lecture are both talking about declination of liiterature reader in these days. The passage claims there are several negative effect by reducing in reading literature. The lecturer in the other hand casts dout in claim made in article. She mentions, decrease in readind litrerature dose not mean that will has negatively impact on sociaty.
First, the author states, decline in book reading, there is nothing will encourage to exercise imaginations. The people will mis important benefits. The writer refutes this notion. He says, mis reading book litreature dose not mean that people do not get skills and information. Moreover, many other types of books like history, science and geographic books can supply many knowledege when individual read them.
Second, the author asserts, if people miss reading litreature books, they will psend there time with unimportant things like watching movies or listen to music. Furthermore, these are just entertainment materials which do not have any benefits. The professor in the other hand contradicts this statement. She states, watching movies and music vedeo are as important as literatures. arts and music have benefits to people and help them to get many knowledge and experience like any literature books
Finally, the author illustrate to many modren literature books which are written by talent writer lack an audience. This argument is challenged by professor. She mentions, many moderen arts and music are also important to audience to read them. moreover, talot of contemprory literature books are invaluable.
The reading passage and lecture are both talking about declination of liiterature reader in these days. The passage claims there are several negative effect by reducing in reading literature. The lecturer in the other hand casts dout in claim made in article. She mentions, decrease in readind litrerature dose not mean that will has negatively impact on sociaty.
First, the author states, decline in book reading, there is nothing will encourage to exercise imaginations. The people will mis important benefits. The writer refutes this notion. He says, mis reading book litreature dose not mean that people do not get skills and information. Moreover, many other types of books like history, science and geographic books can supply many knowledege when individual read them.
Second, the author asserts, if people miss reading litreature books, they will psend there time with unimportant things like watching movies orlisten to music. Furthermore, these are just entertainment materials which do not have any benefits. The professor in the other hand contradicts this statement. She states, watching movies and music vedeo are as important as literatures. arts and music have benefits to people and help them to get many knowlege and experience like any literature books.
Finally, the author illustrate to many modren literature books which are written by talent writer lack an audience. This argument is challenged by professor. She mentions, many modren arts and music are also important to audience to read them. moreover, talot of contemprory literature books are unvaluable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-03 | talelaldabous | 71 | view |
- The reading passage and lecure both about advantages ob using turtle exclusive device to prevent nets of shrimp fishing boats from caughing turtles The author claims that this TED device not good way to solve problem The lecturer in the other hand casts d 60
- The reading passage and lecture are both about online encyclopedias The authors claim a several problems of online encyclopedias that make them less valuble than traditional printed type The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in articles She states non of 73
- The reading passage and lecture are both disccusing how humpback whales navigate during migration The author claims three evidences that humpback used stars for navigation The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article He mentions non of these evid 60
- The passage and lecture are both talking about presence of soft tissue from remnant of blood vessels in resent discovered fossils The author claims three evidences which support present of soft tissue blood vessels in these fossils The lecturer casts doub 60
- The writing passage and lecture are both about propabillty of extinction of rhinoceros horn due to illegal sale by poachers The author of article demonsterates three ideas to save rhinocerose horn from extinction the lecturer casts doubt on claims made in 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage and lecture are both...
^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...fect by reducing in reading literature. The lecturer in the other hand casts dout i...
^^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'exercising'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: exercising
...eading, there is nothing will encourage to exercise imaginations. The people will mis impor...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Arts
... vedeo are as important as literatures. arts and music have benefits to people and h...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... experience like any literature books. Finally, the author illustrate to many m...
^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...lso important to audience to read them. moreover, talot of contemprory literature books ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4593495935 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72461150123 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577235772358 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7333503055 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.6111111111 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304369659942 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101541287568 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163687440277 0.0662205650399 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217525075644 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.271588679993 0.0443174109184 613% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.