The reading passage and the lecture disccuses how to prevent birds from injury by hitting in building made of glass material. The writer claims several solution for this problem. However, the lecturer casts dout on claim made in article. He suggests, non solutions stop birds from getting injury.
First solution author states, replace regular glass with one -side glass which is trasparent from on direction. In this way, birds cannot see in. The speaker contradicts this argument. He mention, when glass change with one side trasperant one. Glass will work as a mirror, therfore, bird will believe that sight is sky and, they keebing fly and hit the glass. So this idea does not work.
Second, the author asserts, doing colorful design like lines painted on glass. This will help birds to realize there is a barriar. Moreover, people still enjoy sights a nd sun light. This notion is refuted by professor. He say, birds will fly and still hitting in between these strips, because they believe it is a gap. Furthermore, if we increase in these sizes, residents can not injoy with out side pictures or sun light.
Finally, the author illustrates on magnatic field to help birds navigate their direction. This point frbuts by professor. He contends, magnatic field work in long distance migration only. In addition, bird in short movement depend particularly on their eyes.
The reading passage and the lecture disccus how to prevent birds from injury by hitting in building made of glass material. The writer claims several solution for this problem. However, the lecturer casts dout on claim made in article. He suggests, non solutions stop birds from getting injury.
First solution author states, replace regular glass with one -side glass which is trasparent from on direction. In this way, birds cannot see in. The speaker contradicts this argument. He mention, when glass change with one side trasperant one. Glass will work as a mirror, therfore, bird will believe that sight is sky and, they keebing fly and hit the glass. So this idea does not worh.
Second, the author asserts, doing colorful design like lines painted on glass. This will help birds to realize there is a barriar. Moreover, people still enjoy sights a nd sun light. This notion is refuted by professor. He say, birds will fly and still hitting in between these strips, because they believe it is a gap. Furthermore, if we increase in these sizes, residents can not injoy with out side pictures or sun light.
Finally, the author illustrates on magnetic field to help birds navigate their direction. This point frbuts by professor. He contends, magnatic field work in long distance migration only. In addition, bird in short movement depend particularly on their eyes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The passage and lecture are both talking about the affect of buzzers on people The writer claims buzzers have hurmful impact on consumers The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He stats the negative impact of buzzers are misleading First the au 76
- The reading passage and the lecture are both discussing accurecy of Robert E Peary expedation to North Pole The writer claims three evidences to express that Peary did reach the North Pole The lecturer in the other hand casts doubt on claim made in articl 71
- Rules are a paramount thing to requlate or sociaty especialy these which expect young people to follow Whether these rules are strict or not this can be weighed in many aspects Admttily some poeple reject these role and concided them strict for young kids 66
- The passage and lecture are mainly about the Pluto The author states Pluto can not be concidedrd as planet and elaborates on three reason to prove that The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article by refuting each statement First writer mention t 65
- The passage and lecture about the number of the birds in the USA the writer claims there is decline in the number of the birds and gives three reasons The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article She said the reasons which are given in the passage ar 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun solution seems to be countable; consider using: 'several solutions'.
Suggestion: several solutions
...de of glass material. The writer claims several solution for this problem. However, the lecturer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...e speaker contradicts this argument. He mention, when glass change with one side traspe...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the glass. So this idea does not worh. Second, the author asserts, doing colorf...
^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...in these sizes, residents can not injoy with out side pictures or sun light. Finally...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: OUT_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'outside'?
Suggestion: outside
...ese sizes, residents can not injoy with out side pictures or sun light. Finally, the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y with out side pictures or sun light. Finally, the author illustrates on magne...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, in addition, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02631578947 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39883012423 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65350877193 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3264385836 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 57.3 110.228320801 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4 21.698381199 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.85 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392917406952 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108695194562 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138086806458 0.0662205650399 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260827521658 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.294622668548 0.0443174109184 665% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 13.3589403974 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.71 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.