The reading passage believes that four day work weeks are beneficial for both the company and workers. But the lecture casts doubt on reading claims and he refutes each of the ideas.
The article claims that the company should give an option to worker four-days a week. The shorter work weeks are beneficial for both the company and the worker and provide three reasons to support. However, the lecture casts doubt on the reading claim. He says that shorter work weeks won't affect the company and the people's lives and refutes each of the reading claims.
First of all, the reading posits that giving an option to work four days with eighty percent of pay would increase the company profits. The lecture, on the other hand, opposes the reading claim. According to the professor, shorter work weeks, force the company to spend extra money rather saving. Although the company doesn't spend money on salaries, they need to spend money on training fresher and for their health insurance. In addition to that, the company has to increase the working space and computers.
Second, the reading believes that the shorter working days reduces the unemployment rate by proving new jobs. However, the professor disagrees. He feels that most of the employees don't follow four-days working policy. In addition to that, the company don't want to spend money on training new workers, Instead, they ask their workers to do overtime. As a result, unpleasant working environment.
Lastly, The reading passage contended that four-day work week improves employer quality. If an employee can afford less pay, they can spend more time on family and leisure activities in exchange. The lecture, on the other hand, believes that shorter work weeks increase the job risk and decreases their quality of life. He believes that shorter work weeks declines the job stability and they are the would terminate first during the recession. Furthermore, it hurts their carrier growth because the company always prefer five days working employee for higher positions
- Fuel-cell engine over internal-combation engin 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- the argument on the online edition of the encyclopedia. the reading claims that online edition has several drawbacks over traditional books. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?1）Interrupt and correct t 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ney rather saving. Although the company doesnt spend money on salaries, they need to s...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...es. He feels that most of the employees dont follow four-days working policy. In add...
^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...olicy. In addition to that, the company dont want to spend money on training new wor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...result, unpleasant working environment. Lastly, The reading passage contended th...
^^^
Line 4, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ys working employee for higher positions
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, second, so, as to, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33452480616 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514950166113 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5975575221 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4736842105 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8421052632 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455140251142 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14132857392 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987742936467 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291898636344 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128348548447 0.0443174109184 290% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.