Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, transportation play’s a prominent role in today’s world. So there has been no shortage of debate whether or not transportation benefit for humans and the environment. However, the question is does the use of cars will become fewer in the future? Some people believe the number of personal car usage will increase as time go forward hence they use for it. On the other hand, I personally feel that in the future people probably limit the use of their own cars for reasons I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, one big challenge in nowadays is water and air pollution and as the time go forward, the situation get worse. Hence, the government should take a serious decision to control the situation such as implementing new policies to limit the use of personal vehicles on specific days or time. The recent decision had took by Indian government was a best example to illustrate this. In India, because of serious condition for people like senior citizens and children, Government oblige people to use their personal cars in the downtowns and heavy crowded places. Because of this kind of rules, fewer cars in the streets; the condition gets better recently.
In addition, advancement of transportation prone people to use public transportation instead of own vehicles because it is cost-effective. If people consider public transport ; they can save a lot of money because they are not necessary to spend money for insurance and fuel. On the top of that, public can escape from the heavy traffic. My friend Alex is best example to explain this situation. When we were working in a corporate company; initially he drove his car for work: as a result, he spend almost twenty percent of his salary for car maintenance. Later, he realized and started to use public transportation and saved couple dollars.
In conclusion, people in next few years probably limit the use of personal vehicles because of heavy pollution and traffic. Moreover, it is going to very expensive. So I feel it is better to control the use of cars to save environment from pollution as well as to save some money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | thonsapon83 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | TEJAS PATIL | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | Luis Cortes | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | fofty | 70 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they challenge points made in the reading 47
- the argument on the online edition of the encyclopedia. the reading claims that online edition has several drawbacks over traditional books. 81
- the effectiveness of internal combustion over the fuel-cell engine in automobiles. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most experiences in our lives that seemed difficult at the time become valuable lessons for the future. 70
- the reading passage and lecture argue about the pros and cons of teamwork vs Individual work 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...So there has been no shortage of debate whether or not transportation benefit for humans and t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 34, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...ssay. To begin with, one big challenge in nowadays is water and air pollution and as the t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...c days or time. The recent decision had took by Indian government was a best example...
^^^^
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ision had took by Indian government was a best example to illustrate this. In Ind...
^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
... from the heavy traffic. My friend Alex is best example to explain this situation. When...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...drove his car for work: as a result, he spend almost twenty percent of his salary for...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the use of cars to save environment from pollution as well as to save some money....
^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ollution as well as to save some money.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, as to, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, by and large, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88674033149 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8134666721 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522099447514 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8720466541 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1052631579 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05263157895 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197328424054 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614678081177 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536791997029 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12364866599 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456971755913 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.