Sea otter decline population
The reading and the lecture are both about the decling population of the sea otter. Whereas the the author of the reading states that the number of sea otter declined becuse of the pollution. The lecturer suggests that the reason of this decline is the preditor.
First of all, according to the reading, there are oil rigs and other sources in the alaskan coast that couse pollution. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She says that the orces his deit was eating whales until the human hunt the whales in that aera which leaves no other choise for orces exept eating sea mammals.
Secondlyy, The reading stated that other sea mammals also declined which means that both sea mammals and sea otter facing the same life-threateing cause. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She argues that the preditor has to change his deit in order to servive since the whale are hunted by human.
Finally, the reading claims that the comunty thinks that the pollution explains the uneven pattern of otter decline. On the other hand, the lecturer belive that there is some areas the population is not affected because it is hard to reach by orces the preditor.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement My lifestyle is easier and more comfortable than the one my grandparents experienced when they were young Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 70
- memoir of Chevalier de Seingalt 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he decling population of the sea otter. Whereas the the author of the reading states th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ng population of the sea otter. Whereas the the author of the reading states that the n...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ng population of the sea otter. Whereas the the author of the reading states that the n...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e number of sea otter declined becuse of the pollution. The lecturer suggests tha...
^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some areas'?
Suggestion: there are some areas
...he other hand, the lecturer belive that there is some areas the population is not affected because ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, as to, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90452261307 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28845788004 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537688442211 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2309208074 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7272727273 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348915807736 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123931940342 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141516328305 0.0662205650399 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222037465152 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164487202316 0.0443174109184 371% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.