Sea otters
The reading article and lecture both discuss a fascinating topic decline in population of sea otters. The article postulates that the population of sea otters is declining on the Alaskan coast and provides three compelling reasons to support. The lecturer in lecture explains about the predator hypothesis and provides reasons for the same.
First and foremost according to passage the pollution source along the Alaskan coast are the oil rigs which increased the level of chemicals into the water which leads to decrease in the population of sea otters. The lecturer in lecture refutes this claim by stating fact that sea otters are dieing because of predation. The sea otters are the pray for the animals they killed sea otters and eat right a way.
Secondly, the article posits that the pollution not only result in the population decline of the sea otters but affected other animals too. It is affecting the whole ecosystem. However the lecturer in lecture rebuts this by mentioning that sea otters kill whales and eat them but, as sea whales are declining they have started eating other animals and this result in declining of population of other species.
Lastly, the author wraps the argument by posting that due to pollution hypothesis the population is declined in some areas while remained stable in other areas this explained by the ocean currents. The lecturer opposes this point by explaining that population is stable in areas of shallow rocks while it declined on the coast where pollutants concentration is high
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | Soham Chinchalkar | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | Soham Chinchalkar | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-13 | zaid | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Naveena0 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | Vincent Samuel | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...es three compelling reasons to support. The lecturer in lecture explains about the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...o. It is affecting the whole ecosystem. However the lecturer in lecture rebuts this by ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, lastly, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09920634921 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54197255386 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7823159528 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.818181818 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35331657678 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170780582055 0.0996497079465 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174757153657 0.0662205650399 264% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243408057061 0.162205337803 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167904700094 0.0443174109184 379% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.