smart cars
The reading and lecture are both about smart cars that basically drive themselves. The author of the reading feels that smart cars will provide a lot benefits, like keep the driving more secure, faster and cheaper. The lecture disagrees with the claims made by the author. In her opinion smart car technology will not clearly produce such benefits.
Initially, the author argues that smart cars will save people’s lives and also prevent accidents. The article mention that will be use high-tech equipment to avoid collisions. This point is challenged by the lecture. She claims that the number of accidents do not will reduce. Additionally, she says that, if will be increase the number of cars driving fast on the streets, of course, the chance to take a big crash involving more cars will be high. She do not have reasons to believe that smart cars will be a good employment.
Secondly, the writer suggests that the traffic problems will be eliminate. In the article, it is said that by using smart cars the speed of driving will be fast. The lecture, however, counters this by mentioning that increasing the highway speeds will not be safe. She elaborates on this by bringing up the point that if an accident happen more cars will be involved and dimension of the accident will be bigger.
Finally, the author states that smart cars will reduce the cost of driving, the article continues, stating that, driving for most direct routes, consequently people will not spend a lot of money on repairs. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is that this type of technology is really expensive. She notes that sensors of control and the high level of technology, will become a regular repair more expensive than the replacement of a traditional mechanics car parts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-17 | Julie.Zhu | 85 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | villian7 | 75 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People communicate with each other less than in the past because of the popularity of television. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Some people say that computers have made the life easier and more convenient. Other say that computers had made life more complex and stressful. What is your opinion? 73
- People work because they need money to live. What are some other reasons that people work? Discuss one or more of these reasons. Use specific examples and details to support your answer. 70
- If you could study a subject that you have never had the opportunity to study, what would you choose? Explain your choice using specific reasons and details. 63
- Describe a custom from your country that you would like people from other countries to adopt. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...riving more secure, faster and cheaper. The lecture disagrees with the claims made ...
^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...h involving more cars will be high. She do not have reasons to believe that smart ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, in contrast, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98322147651 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62963092194 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526845637584 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9771183656 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3529411765 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336550095882 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142462646351 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140658268261 0.0662205650399 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255459559444 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943366373042 0.0443174109184 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.