Summarize the point of the lecture and the reading about movie, Gone with the wind.
Cinematography industry is one of the most important nowadays. Technology, life events, story-telling, makes it a terrific world with his own personal experiences.
Gone with the wind is an example of evolution demonstrating how things change for in different directions.
The lecturer challenges the ideas in the writing about the characters and the way the scenes are planned to affect society.
First, the author describes the main characters, named or nameless, that are part of this cast. It is mentioned a racist behave of one of the characters making the movie not very kind for the southern society. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that is it part of the script and the role of that actor is to bring out to light the reality. Furthermore, he says that some part of the role it is improvised to make it more dramatic and get you more involved in that story.
Secondly, the writer contends that the infancy of the cinema is correlated to some acts that make us reflect and a look at things from a different point of view. For example, the role of slaves, always being used and underestimated, being slapped on
the face right there in the movie may seem very racist from that part of society. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that it was a great progression for the community. He elaborates on this by mentioning that many new job position were opened for black people regarding to the white supremacy, Let's point out the black lady that won the price inthe academy. By showing another part of life and picking the best actors, people that belong to the real life story, everythoing will come more organic.
Finally, it is statedd in the article that looking back at this industry should not make us proud but still it is noticeable how far we have come. The lecturer on the other hand., posts that it is an absolutely normal way to progress, leave everything behind, and admire this roles and the way thy made all the communities together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | NoorZia | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | Kumari Soni | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | rahulsingh773 | 3 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | michaelallen | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | FERIDE08 | 70 | view |
- Agree Disagree. attending their classes should be optional 90
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 76
- Should we replace the old historic building with the new ones? 80
- Social media on Integrated task. Please summarize the reading and the lecture. 76
- Summarize the points of the lecture and the reading about Claudius empire 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed and underestimated, being slapped on the face right there in the movie may se...
^^^
Line 6, column 351, Rule ID: PRICE_PRIZE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prize' (reward)?
Suggestion: prize
...s point out the black lady that won the price inthe academy. By showing another part ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ss, leave everything behind, and admire this roles and the way thy made all the comm...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 346.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75144508671 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67737403409 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9304082123 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0919591188389 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273191334514 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461484755006 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0564429184226 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545915904236 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.