Summarize the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they opposes specific points made in the reading passage.
Both, the reading and the professor are talking about appearance of professors on Television. The reading claims that appearance of Professors in television programs is beneficial for professors themselves, for universities, and for public also. However, the lecturer cast doubt upon them and opposes each of author’s claim.
First of all, the lecturer states that it is not good from their professional standpoint. They get the impression of non serious scholars but their appearance in TV programs counts as a entertainment. As a result, they are not invited in univerty’s important meetings and conferences. This disputes the reading which claims that this will increase their importance as a scholar not only in university but in more people.
Secondly, instead of utilizing their valuable time towards student’s help and other important university meetings, they will waste it towards figuring out what to present, travelling, rehersels and how to look good on these TV programs. He added that this will decrease unversity reputation. This is contradicts the reading which explains that appearance of professor in TV programs will increase the popularity of university. As a result, more funds and more appilcations of brighter students will come.
Finally, the lecture points out that TV networks don’t want intellectual substance but they only wants academic title. A TV reporter can provide that kind of material by little more homework. This refutes reading which claims that appearance of professors in TV programs is helpful for general public who cannot have a chance to learn from them.
- Summarize the main points in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed in the reading passage 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statementThe most important factor that influences students success in school is a good teacher. 73
- Summarize the main points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they opposes specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Summarize the main points from the lecture. How they cast doubt upon reading passage? 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to work at a job that you enjoy even if the salary is low than it is to have a high paying job that you do not enjoy It is more important to work at a job that you enjoy 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...elves, for universities, and for public also. However, the lecturer cast doubt upon ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eir appearance in TV programs counts as a entertainment. As a result, they are no...
^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease the popularity of university. As a result, more funds and more appilcations...
^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rofessors in TV programs is helpful for general public who cannot have a chance to learn from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...annot have a chance to learn from them.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, look, second, secondly, so, kind of, talking about, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50199203187 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07406083258 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549800796813 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7597987722 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6428571429 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100567315927 0.272083759551 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0340323626912 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283149675061 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061039962818 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104249731703 0.0443174109184 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.