Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the new guidelines adopted in the United Kingdom helped to address the specific problems discussed in the reading passage.
In this set of materials, the writer and the lecturer are talking about The United Kingdom history kind of buildings, tool and art products. Accompanying the writer's disclosures, the lecturer explains new guidelines plan giving additional details and examples about the subject. The details of her speech are summarized in the following paragraphs.
The United Kingdom or Britain has significant historical artifacts which include culture and art about old settlement. It has wide range from the Stone Age to Industrial Ages. But now, it is under threat that construction new settlement areas or apartment. According to writer construction projects are caused hazards result. For example, some historical sites destroyed due to the excavation. Although lecturer thinks counter side. She says that construction company has to get permission from archeologists. They examine the excavation area whether it is found valuable artifacts. If they finds, they must do preservation plants.
The Government gives more financial support to the preservations archeological sites. Writer says financial support is inadequate. But lecturer gives additional details about this problem. Construction companies should give financial support, if it is found any historical artifacts or tools.
On the other hand, Archaeology jobs need solutions related with hiring new job. It is known difficult career way. Writer states that they do not have job opportunity. But lecturer says that companies need expert archaeologists. Because they do plan to preserve new construction areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-26 | kiarashk | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | arizaturan | 81 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | arizaturan | 3 | view |
| 2017-09-11 | ajulyav | 3 | view |
| 2017-09-11 | ajulyav | 3 | view |
- The İmmigration history and progress in the America. Summarize the points made in the talk you just heard, explaining how they contrasted with points made in the reading. 3
- do u agree or disagree ? advertisings affects people in negative way 76
- Carbon footprint 78
- When people move to another country, some of them decide to follow the customs of the new country; others prefer to keep their own customs. Compare these two choices. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons support your answer. 70
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or dis agree with this point of view? Why or why not? 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... sites destroyed due to the excavation. Although lecturer thinks counter side. She says ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'find'
Suggestion: find
...it is found valuable artifacts. If they finds, they must do preservation plants. ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t companies need expert archaeologists. Because they do plan to preserve new constructi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, as to, for example, kind of, talking about, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76824034335 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06562771297 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618025751073 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 21.2450331126 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9168014465 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.0 110.228320801 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.0952380952 21.698381199 51% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.52380952381 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0794748672128 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0208879065264 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293420443694 0.0662205650399 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0507844652211 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386189457678 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.0 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.498013245 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.