Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about how the famous novelist Jane Austen would look like? The author of the reading states that the non professional sketch of her which later on painted by other professional artist is the only accepted painting of her. The lecturer disagrees. He mention the painting does not resemble her by any chance and attacks each of the claim made in the article.
Firstly, the author of the reading begins by stating that after Austen demise her family had given her portrait as an illustration in an edition of her letter. Therefore, they recognized the painting was of Austen and claim it. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends that the painting was authorized in the year 1882 and she died almost 70 years ago so the family who claimed the painting to be of Austen did not have seen her in real life.
Secondly, according to the writing the girl is identical to Austen which means the attributes of girl in the painting is exactly match with Austen. Thus, this clearly shows the girl resembles Austen for sure. The speaker on other hand points out that although they are similar to some extent this might be because Austen had large family so the painting is suceptible to resemble one of her niece not Austen herself.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that even though the painting date is obscure the style of artist that links with painting shows a kind of painting that could be afforded by merely affluent family like Austen. Furthermore, he was active in painting during the period when Austen was a teenage girl. The professor rebuts this argument. Her puts forth the idea that the stamp on the back of black canvas clearly depict the syle of another artist. Moreover, he used to sketch in th period when Austen was in her late 20’s. Thus, this proves the painting of a teenage girl is not of Austen.
As we can see, the author and lecturer shows conflicting views on the Austen appearance evidence. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 78
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 71
- young people have no influence on important decision that determine the future of the society as a whole Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t is the only accepted painting of her. The lecturer disagrees. He mention the pain...
^^^
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...ting of her. The lecturer disagrees. He mention the painting does not resemble her by a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'matched'.
Suggestion: matched
...utes of girl in the painting is exactly match with Austen. Thus, this clearly shows t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 355.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78309859155 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40403350803 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.6846084952 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3684210526 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6842105263 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941501192404 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0321405504317 0.0996497079465 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358088624144 0.0662205650399 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0562902527243 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328721742849 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.