Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecture are both about the amatuer portrait painted by Austen’s sister Cassandra which later on professionally painted. The reading passage states the since there are not many instances for what adult Austen would looked like, many people believe the girl in the portrait is Austen. The lecturer disagrees. He opposed that the girl does not resemble Austen and attacks each of the claim maide in the article.
Firstly, the author begins by stating that after several decades of her demise her family decendents had given permission to use her portrait as an illustration in her letter. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends that the portrait was authorized after almost 70 years of Austen death so the family who are claiming had not not actually seen her in real life. Therefore, this claim of her family does not seem to be convincing.
Secondly, according to the writing girl in Cassandra’s painting clearly resembles the face of Austen. Even though the painting is of adult Austen the details such as her eyes, mouth, body shape as so on are exactly similar to teen Austen. The speaker on other hand points out that since Austen had extended family there were many female cousin who were of same age. So, there is a probability that the girl could resemble any one of them. In addition, there has been evidences that two of her niece looked like Austen. Hence, the girl in the painting might portray any one of her.
Finally, the reading passage also notes that the even though the date and name of painter is anonymous the style of painting exactly matches with the artist Austen faimily would hire. Not only this, the painter used to actively painting during the period when Auten was in her teens. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that stamp on the black canvas shows that painting was not sold prior to her teen age. Similarly, the artist began to sell her portrait when she was 27 years old. Thus, it is clear that the girl in the painting is not Austen.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting views on proving girl in the painting as Austen . The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents are the best teachers Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by government rather than individuals Give specific reasons and examples to support your answers 85
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'look'
Suggestion: look
...y instances for what adult Austen would looked like, many people believe the girl in t...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eve the girl in the portrait is Austen. The lecturer disagrees. He opposed that the...
^^^
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by stating that after several decades of her demise her family decendents had giv...
^^
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...eath so the family who are claiming had not not actually seen her in real life. Therefo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...condly, according to the writing girl in Cassandra’s painting clearly resembles t...
^^
Line 4, column 420, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: teenage
...that painting was not sold prior to her teen age. Similarly, the artist began to sell he...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...turer holds conflicting views on proving girl in the painting as Austen . The spe...
^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... proving girl in the painting as Austen . The speaker effectively challenges the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 383.0 270.72406181 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80678851175 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.04702891845 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37630029966 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 145.348785872 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511749347258 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7665671111 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6818181818 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4090909091 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04545454545 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0487150898338 0.272083759551 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0175569862095 0.0996497079465 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276591700006 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0316387607665 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021772290686 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.