Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
The reading and lecturer are both about the bibliotherapist which is also referred as self help books. The author of the reading states that reading these books people can cure their personal and emotional pain to great extent. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions this is just a muth and attacks each of the claims made in the article.
First, the author begins by stating that studying these books let people believe that there are not the only person suffering from pain and confer hope to get rid of it. In addition, people can obtain practical solution so that they can be applied in our real life problems. The professor believes there are flaws in the writer’s position. He contends that indeed they feel hopeful and content with the convenient methods described in it however it stays for a short period of time since they are not real solution.
Secondly, the book contain innovative ideas of author and is applicable to deal with certain situation that people are dealing with. Furthermore, people are suceptible to get out of their comfort zone and feel happy with the situation. The speaker on other hand points out that not even a single concept are indigenous, they are merely shuffled the old contents. Owing to the unawareness of people they find it new however this is not the case. Therefore, even if they tend to feel satisfied while reading books they return to their initial stage after a while and suffer even the worse.
Finally, the reading also notes that self help books are superior over personal therapist. Additionally, they can visualize their future with no sufferings at all. The professor rebuts this argument. He puts forth the idea that no psychiatric can be superceded by books which just delineate about the empty speech. Hence, it is suggested to visit their personal therapist so as to get rid of emotional as well as personal pain.
As we can see, the author and lecturer holds conflicting vies on bibliotherapist. The speaker effectively challenges the writer’s argument.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to be able to work with a group of people on a team than to work independently 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 90
- Some people think that space travel is important to the development of humanity while other people believe it is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nal and emotional pain to great extent. The lecturer disagrees. He mentions this is...
^^^
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ibed in it however it stays for a short period of time since they are not real solution. Seco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 372, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ested to visit their personal therapist so as to get rid of emotional as well as persona...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, as to, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 340.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95882352941 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60976340918 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532352941176 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5180477179 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129605932076 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381830742002 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333385122536 0.0662205650399 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0701849604998 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381427931418 0.0443174109184 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.