Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
According to the lecture, it is not absolutey true that taxes on smoking would make society healthier than it is. To justify why the lecturer doubt about the benefits of the taxing policy, the followings were described:
First, making unhealthy foods and smoking expensive does not merely lead to reducing usage of them. Imagine one that buys specific high quality cigarette everyday and after rising the price, he or she could not afford it; So the cheaper brand with less quality would success the high quality brand and here is the issue. On the better word taxing policy could result in more unhealthy behaviors or consequances.
Cosideration the income of the consumers is the second objection. A person who is wealthy would not wonder about how much tax would pay, but the poor pay the tax equal to the rich. Smoking and unhealthy feeding tax should consider the differences among people and the rich should be charged more than others. The fiancial unfairity of this plan is a critical problem.
The last one is that the government might be dependent to the income from the unhealthy behavior taxes; In this situation, for example, authorities might avoid to forbid smoking in public locations or inhibit advertising against smoking to increase its income. So the money not only would not be spent to constructing stadiums, schools, hospitals etc., but also, would be harmful to the public health.
As a summary, the financial benefits of such taxes might be spent to other purposes and the main goal of the plan would not be achived properly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-29 | Opak Pulup | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | NIMA SAEEDI | 80 | view |
- TPO 53 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 78
- TPO 53 integrated task 3
- TOEFL T P O 26 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...at buys specific high quality cigarette everyday and after rising the price, he or she c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid forbidding'.
Suggestion: avoid forbidding
...tuation, for example, authorities might avoid to forbid smoking in public locations or inhibit ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93511450382 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50237635442 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583969465649 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4921885787 49.2860985944 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.545454545 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0638794020108 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.023341711046 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0183116922954 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0388756702533 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146318513291 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.