Well the professor mentions that how her point of view is different than the critics of the movie. She does not agree with them. She feels that sometimes movie critics like Malcolm, do not understand the real message of the movies by its content, instead they see the disparity that how African community was treated before civil war and movies depicts that in a good way. Although, reading passage shows, many critics had the same view.
In the lecture, professor focuses on how this movie has helped African community in different ways. Many african actors were casted to play differents roles in the movie, who were otherwise wouldn't be a part of cinema in that era. She strongly beleives that the movie has provided the job opportunities to african people. And that emphasized their position in society.
Professor believes, that the movie has not partrayed anything about racism, instead it was on a theme of feminism. Also the Southern family shown in the movie might not be behaving to their servant out of racism, it was just a rash foolish act.
Malcom mentions about the hysterical acting of Prissy in passage, which was played by butterfly McQueen. Nevertheless, professor argue on this point and says that, the reason prissy acted in such a way, could be a mere instruction by director of the movie. Also professor doubts on Malcom view on Mammy, though, its true that she was not given first name in the movie, still, she was the smartest character of the movie and shows a fierce protest to protect her people. Overall, mammy's role was very strong in the movie. Thus, this movies ended up grabbing many awards.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in relationship between people. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading.In 1939, David O Selznick produced a film of Margaret Mitchell’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Gone with the Wind. The movie proved to 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on points made in the reading.In 1939, David O Selznick produced a film of Margaret Mitchell’s Pulitzer Prize winning novel, Gone with the Wind. The movie proved to 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...that how her point of view is different than the critics of the movie. She does not ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... roles in the movie, who were otherwise wouldnt be a part of cinema in that era. She st...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...nt be a part of cinema in that era. She strongly beleives that the movie has provided the job opp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... instead it was on a theme of feminism. Also the Southern family shown in the movie ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e instruction by director of the movie. Also professor doubts on Malcom view on Mamm...
^^^^
Line 7, column 528, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ole was very strong in the movie. Thus, this movies ended up grabbing many awards.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, still, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83571428571 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38446288822 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.5068277117 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2666666667 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926448699412 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313181263605 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251224237512 0.0662205650399 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586229958283 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229306153796 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.