In the passage, it primarily explains about Altruism and example of it. The passage stated that Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. There are two different opinion between the lecture and the passage.
First of all, the author points out that the meerkat, which is a mammal that dwells in burrows in grassland areas of Africa, is often cited as an example. In groups of meerkats, an individual acts as a sentinel, standing guard and looking out for predators while the others hunt for food or eat food they have obtained. On the other hand, the point is challenged by the lecture. The lecture claims that meerkats actually have an advantage of guarding the area.If the danger comes,they are the first ones to escape.
Secondly, the author contends that sentinels guard the others while eating. By standing guard,the sentinel meerkat gains nothing—it goes without food while the others eat. According to the lecture the sentinels eat first before they guard. After it issues an alarm, it has to flee alone, which might make it more at risk to a predator, since animals in groups are often able to work together to fend off a predator. In contrast, the lecture rebuts this argument. The lecture posits that the other meerkats, which looking for food, are actually greater in danger;also, alarm call might caused other meerkats member together very quickly. those are for tension of predator away from the color.
Finally, the author states that donating kidney is an example of altruism. However, the lecture posits that this in not an act of altruism because people will gain social acceptance and self worth.
- Glass is a favored building material 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should require every graduating students to take public speaking courses. Give specific examples and details to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city. Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay. 60
- As you read the passage below consider how Paul Bogard uses evidence such as facts or examples to support claims reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence stylistic or persuasive elements such as w 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than parents were in the past 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
... have an advantage of guarding the area.If the danger comes,they are the first one...
^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
...of guarding the area.If the danger comes,they are the first ones to escape. Second...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...e others while eating. By standing guard,the sentinel meerkat gains nothing—it goes ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'meerkats'' or 'meerkat's'?
Suggestion: meerkats'; meerkat's
...ger;also, alarm call might caused other meerkats member together very quickly. those are...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Those
... meerkats member together very quickly. those are for tension of predator away from t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95833333333 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41585834183 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559027777778 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2187392018 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.25 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0493038863786 0.272083759551 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0211563861395 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377482783037 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0495442785598 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499513819169 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.