The main idea of both the reading and the talk is theories about the cause of the odd sounds. Considering this, the author provides three theories. The professor, on the other hand, categorically denies whatever mentioned in the passage through citing three reasons.
First, the author discusses that the strange sound was caused by orcas during a courtship ritual. The lecturer, nonetheless, rejects the author's view and illustrates that the whales live in the surface of the water whereas the submarine is in the deep ocean and cannot hear the sounds.
second, the passage argues another theory, saying the sounds were caused by giant squid. The professor, nevertheless, supports a contradictory view as compared to that presented in the reading; he describes that giant squids have always lived in the water, while the strange sound had been heard for only two decades. Therefore, there is no rational reason why the sound suddenly disappeared.
Third, The author of the reading passage states that the sound probably had an external source and caused by other submarines. However, the lecturer refutes it, saying that the sound changed its direction rapidly, while submarine could not able to do this quickly and with no engine noise. Furthermore, she asserts that even today it is impossible to make that kind of submarine.
All in all, the professor completely casts doubt on the theories which mentioned in the passage and rejects them.
- TPO.14 85
- TPO 14 Q1 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the busy and crowded world, we should not expect people to be polite to each other. 76
- T-P-O 40 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the busy and crowded world, we should not expect people to be polite to each other. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...eep ocean and cannot hear the sounds. second, the passage argues another theory, say...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16170212766 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60781983842 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612765957447 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1681083983 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.083333333 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.