TPO 14 Q1
The article states that salvage logging is beneficial both to a damaged forest and to the economy. However, the professor explains that there are problems with the author’s arguments. The professor believes that salvage logging advantages are controversy and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading states that after a devastating fire, salvage logging removes the remains of dead trees and makes room for fresh growth immediately. The professor refutes this point by stating that cleaning up the forests of dead trees harms the habitat because it significantly deprives the soil of important materials. In other words, dead trees provide essential nutritive substances that are indispensable for the resurgence of the forest.
Second, the article claims that salvage logging helps decline the dangers of insect incursion. Conversely, the lecturer argues that all the insects are not bad even spruce bark beetle lived in Alaskan forests for hundreds of years without causing any considerable damage. She asserts that dead trees are shelter not only for harmful insects but also for different species of insects and birds.
Third, although the author of the reading claims that salvage logging has an enormous impact on the economy, the professor counters that argument by asserting that the economic benefits of doing such things are small and temporary. Because many expensive tools and machines like helicopters will be needed to maintain that place. Also, the job which might be created for this aim is temporary, and it needs hiring the people who are not local which costs a lot of training.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-08 | Mohammadreza1991 | 85 | view |
| 2019-02-03 | vida00 | 80 | view |
| 2016-04-29 | abdilrahman | 80 | view |
| 2015-11-18 | SarahAlsalihi | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34241245136 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63845939916 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599221789883 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.623952978 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.416666667 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422805359568 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147783602783 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878428083753 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234597816327 0.162205337803 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792396235684 0.0443174109184 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.