TOEFL TPO 33- Integrated Writing Task
The passage discusses carved stone balls found in different locations in Scotland. The archaeologists have different ideas about these stone's meaning. The text provides three reasons to explain the meaning of these artifacts. However, the professor refutes all of the author's reasons.
First, the passage asserts these stone balles used as wapons for hunting or fighting. While the lecture rejevcts this idea by stating that the surface of these tools are very smooth. If these tools used for these goals we could see signs on the surface of these devices.
Second, the readinf contends maybe these artifacts were used as measuring tools. However, the talk rebuts this bt expaining that these tools are made up of different stones. So, they were different in their dencity. As aresult, these objects were not suitable for determining weight or whatever else. As you can see, the text's idea is not convincing.
Third, the reading claims these objects show the status of their owners. The passage describes that there are many elaborating signs on the surface of these tools that we can consider them as something for indicating the owner prestige in society. While the teacher refutes this by saying that if thede tools are something for showing their prestige, we will see most of them with very detailed signs. But most of them are very simple. Furthermore, the professor states that if someone died he would burried with his/her valuable posession. But there are no evidences of finding these stone objects in graves. So, the reading's reason is impractical.
- TOEFL TPO 11- Integrated Writing Task 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 14 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- tpo 03-integrated writing 71
- TPO 2 integrated writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...erent ideas about these stones meaning. The text provides three reasons to explain ...
^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...tifacts. However, the professor refutes all of the authors reasons. First, the passage as...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 86, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...used as wapons for hunting or fighting. While the lecture rejevcts this idea by stati...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'texts'' or 'text's'?
Suggestion: texts'; text's
...t or whatever else. As you can see, the texts idea is not convincing. Third, the rea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10546875 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43772222044 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55859375 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4023770357 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.7894736842 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4736842105 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52631578947 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.27373068433 351% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184951710938 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671875998062 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803992503817 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126880864833 0.162205337803 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543959378 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.