TOP-4
The reading and the lecture are both about whether the dinasaurs were endotherms or not. The author believes that dinosaurs were enotherms, and he supports his argues by three reasons. The lecturer cousts doubt on the claims made in the article. She refutes the reasons which is given by the author.
First of all, the author points out that the place which dinosaur fossils have bben discovered is Polar Regions which are very cold. That means only the animals that can sustain a temerature could be active to live at those regions. This point is challenged by the lecturer. She says in that period of time the weather was warm enough in those regions.
Secondly, The author condents that by mentioning the connection between endothermy and the posion and movement of the legs. It is mentioned that the legs that endothermy has allows for hit to maintains physical activvity such tuninng, however this can be for animal’s legs which are positioned inderneath its body, not in the side of the body. On the other hand, the lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggests the postion of the legs not necessary mean something like the reading says. She elaborats that by saying that the poistion of legs might help them to grow faster.
Finally, The author states that the realationship between bone structure and endothermy. The article notes that the bones of the endotherms contens structure called Haversian canals Which allow the living animal to grow quickly. In contrasts, the lecrurer posits this idea. She says although the author is true, the bone has growth germony which makes the animals that has this charactristic grow slowley.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e supports his argues by three reasons. The lecturer cousts doubt on the claims mad...
^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...enged by the lecturer. She says in that period of time the weather was warm enough in those re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'maintain'.
Suggestion: maintain
...s that endothermy has allows for hit to maintains physical activvity such tuninng, howeve...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04379562044 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48342579869 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576642335766 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9664861356 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2941176471 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1176470588 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.